Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 25 February 2020 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B103A0B34 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:59:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tgb-li7ZWyCE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09ACC3A0905 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:59:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.147] (p548DC4D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.196.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48RgXR1Rvdz107w; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:19 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: Further update on COVID-19 (Coronavirus) and IETF 107 Vancouver
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <b4c73db4-dccd-35a5-4c5f-70ca589e36e7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:18 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 604331958.657729-c9b92c9d2bb1ba7f5d7d82275e52c3e2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F8D32DA6-A5EB-4D87-B276-464268E9D47C@tzi.org>
References: <158258721017.24319.9082233711977122647.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <huvor7s4wdpy5cgqtxgx1v4k.1582587718389@email.android.com> <253b29f1-f11f-92da-855c-9ac3b01e76a3@gmail.com> <b4c73db4-dccd-35a5-4c5f-70ca589e36e7@gmail.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/WQIxtYPYOrYKGuHLcrb3BIX83pU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:59:24 -0000

> These organisations are good in their neutrality but the last thing they will ever say is 'I dont know’.

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22unknown%22+site:+https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/specific-groups/guidance-business-response.html says:

> … Much is unknown about how the COVID-19 spreads. Current knowledge is largely based on what is known about similar coronaviruses. …


And so on.

I don’t think we gain anything from adopting the anti-science positions (as in, talk to your yoga teacher because they are more trustworthy than the scientists are) that are so popular today.  As the other people replying on this thread have said, IETF leadership is reacting on the issue in an exemplary manner; I’m really impressed.

(Obviously, anyone of us must decide for themselves how to handle their safety, and anyone in a leadership position must decide how to lead in this situation.  And, yes: be prepared...)

Grüße, Carsten