Re: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 23 January 2021 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E04A3A09ED for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:13:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVc7xPXtuXU1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-2.web-hosting.com (server217-2.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37A1C3A09EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:13:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2lhCrQERab7vmn/1Rr+okuk3jkHr4bxnEQxJ/H3FC4Q=; b=STeAAkOZLrsjHuYt+/w7WEElPA zW70QqRT/F074KV7Di92hNNuolZcjNeGb1NjpMrOVDRi9U57mgC9Aj7WXTDWr+Zx50XsnxaQ4JSVD UIrO8QrmV9J4b2FHMqqKd31y2DwGtFf8zf0Am2fOgqWqU+u/DbHlJuf0d8Q92NLbhu/o2z55mK2Tt vDfJhA0X2Z7eLxUwraaTYyyqiaQiyv+sqT2pogM3tQUChZM+WiNp3x0PLmjHZQw6zujZ34l5MbkwT tBi80ELcmLnKp+tj5jxNIP1tJO9Gac1gTnLOuV7hN2HOScMcI8mefSEVTpdBOSXqSJ6M1QN3J3dtO K0Vt5YtA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:59860 helo=[192.168.1.13]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1l3MSq-003JO7-Pk; Sat, 23 Jan 2021 12:12:51 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <53d7190a-3e1f-66b3-0574-8e8fbb3a7a5e@si6networks.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 09:12:44 -0800
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <239F4968-4B84-4FCF-9F64-65D6892D6FA7@strayalpha.com>
References: <53d7190a-3e1f-66b3-0574-8e8fbb3a7a5e@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18B92)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/giX2JaGXkiMkZlmHzEB9703yjTU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 17:13:04 -0000


> On Jan 22, 2021, at 11:37 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> One *internet-draft* certainly doesn't undermine E2E. However, I guess
> that an *RFC* published as a "Proposed Standard" probably does (undermine) E2E?

Not when it doesn’t update the hundreds of other standards that don’t.

I also didn’t see it discuss transport pseudoheaders, but maybe it’s buried somewhere in related docs.

Joe