Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> Sat, 28 May 2016 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4C512D163 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Wfj2Gi1YRkx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5705312D162 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n129so36586793wmn.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krsek-cz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dOjV7Wu7iRMNMV/imEzbMPCv4aR7b+Xvn2lNiRuVuhU=; b=0EEtqP4NJCeWJ6uUv3NccyJ6Tqo3N6SXKW7WH0V5ne5Sn0ticuzwVdv7gMzUdp3NMF j5LE4Q5PnXH08Y6xLOL5DrtHOkH993m3HQeEfspZqlYzNp0IetyuIKzgUBYgU8IZhZO8 LnkoVnTCem82PqEt41CFWLMKkl9wp/kh0zNvvcUVVsoYpEqbqMvSk+X4P45hXExDjBDr nayZM7tTl4bccMlckkCRoc3+rfnxZ+aWq8trOfebETNE1Vd0IS7liTGBJED5rPbX8rvj oc4zpWSnnxcaK8iHe+tGNELfFymacy2p7O0ciOKXTqbri9iZOqLN+zYh0bWW0ch+nUlg jRBQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dOjV7Wu7iRMNMV/imEzbMPCv4aR7b+Xvn2lNiRuVuhU=; b=iOZW0sHvXTLydlD85rUdvSAwu8B/1d5Tf7eHAgIhC9wjqWNCNqZUDx4TzFPhi2gYU4 amcXAW1kKlRHvKbwc6dIw0DJ5BJoaGadJLVAER0hs6IpnkdpJL2CWQ9K6vYqi2PyMdQx YMH2458cZ1kn3lhCsHfJPGgssrTwUut7FuVAK8nkopXXhYDo/qJAwk+Bt0Y2YX4ardXl Yjp4ZeneLPkKkjB8esLI9JNIjP7hTwDiZx3p8a3hahPEJX588IwJkneaZmGDVUPyex9b t5RpRR40qKYRMMUvd9wepsCEpuRf7GexSW0Uvta30wpDVbjELHzGl/XJtNs3Ett+I8BF ECXQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tL34ZcZ2cGPva0aWS6eYB5PuY+/A6FFPAd/4SvBuJwvrtBB/0nxMiLydzvZK4NCYw==
X-Received: by 10.194.152.202 with SMTP id va10mr20161993wjb.76.1464473535208; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Michals-MacBook-Air.local ([77.78.91.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dj4sm4236229wjc.13.2016.05.28.15.12.14 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 28 May 2016 15:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr2mGNPhUCzWyfAo_DYL3LhjkqRB13zXuj8wMqFQJfE4GA@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEG3zt1ykuVTbi4_3nAAeCUiikXKR5HLj+8KG8U7yxo=NA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3DnzzxeRE8QbkDHS9HCP2Lu8pTbR6o9_ZL21RNNqa2sg@mail.gmail.com> <5749E35E.9030201@si6networks.com> <67e1079c-0937-d09a-79a5-a6c0487a3285@joelhalpern.com> <5749FEF5.7020509@si6networks.com> <ce1e5c8b-84eb-5b40-8ae1-e467f118027b@gmail.com>
From: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>
Message-ID: <574A17C2.1000200@krsek.cz>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 00:12:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ce1e5c8b-84eb-5b40-8ae1-e467f118027b@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/hEGuJYzcUjD2Vl3xknvmBQMio9Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 22:12:35 -0000

Hi Melinda,

>> Not sure why location should be a special case. Maybe some forms of
>> diversity are just not desirable?
>
> Fernando, the specific question about Singapore was about
> safety.

that's shift for me. I read significant number of comments discussing 
situation as "one specific group should be afraid to bring their 
relatives to Singapore and this is not supporting IETF position on 
diversity".

Franky speaking - I share Fernando's view in this case.

Few emails discussing "need of measurements of participation from new 
regions" open a kind of "strange" questions like "do we need to measure 
participation of minorities?". I know there are cultures who discuss 
this kind of topic, but my culture does not allow judging people based 
on their race, citizenship, sex orientation etc. - so I do not like such 
as measurements.

                      Michal

P.S: Simply - the discussion went too far.