Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 26 May 2016 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE9E12D70E; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xgo_6yGFdMXa; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6652C12D74C; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2490; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464280569; x=1465490169; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ITpa+DI6f13+BDW0/jPzaFuaOLMeIhYn00iOzWn9/RA=; b=X7APaQLHZSEHDyz9XFqXMweUBl9XESVS0dc/sJhEHaEYnuWtdhOhE1QO 2nP2aAt2PAnE3v99Mzlbk2qmf77X5rlkqAhOBXzBxk75HbgkAI95s8ZSJ zKZM4Ygst5Xna81A+AZrQHXpsZCggEQSBgDM8GjGXw52JI/yUp8y+UXWW 8=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CQBgARJUdX/5NdJa1bgzlWfQaDPbgsF?= =?us-ascii?q?wuFJUoCgTc7EQEBAQEBAQFlJ4RDAQEBAwEBAQEgSwMBBwULAgEIGCoCAicLJQI?= =?us-ascii?q?EDgUOBogTCA6yAJFWAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDgkFiB0Igk6BOYYHK?= =?us-ascii?q?4IuBZg3AYMqgWiJDY8cj0sBNiyCE4FabohXBDt/AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,369,1459814400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="278129199"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 May 2016 16:36:08 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (xch-rcd-014.cisco.com [173.37.102.24]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4QGa8vC002701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 26 May 2016 16:36:08 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com (173.37.102.23) by XCH-RCD-014.cisco.com (173.37.102.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:36:08 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) by XCH-RCD-013.cisco.com ([173.37.102.23]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:36:07 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Topic: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
Thread-Index: AQHRttIbmzmFmMAvpEWTdrtqmKjeLJ/Luc8AgAAFxAA=
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:36:07 +0000
Message-ID: <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org>
In-Reply-To: <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.119]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_11AADA12-C022-4985-B83E-E39A5511A9B0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tHLOoqWOqsZpVa1OCfJ0yFUOJIk>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:36:12 -0000

> On May 26, 2016, at 9:15 AM, Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@senki.org>; wrote:
> 
> 
> If this is being used as the justification, then South Korea must also be changed. Same problem.
> 
>> On May 25, 2016, at 3:08 PM, IAOC Chair <iaoc-chair@ietf.org>; wrote:
>> 
>> Reasons for Cancellation of IETF 100 Meeting in Singapore, and the IAOC understands that to be:
>> 
>> “    Singapore laws against same-sex relationships between men and
>>   preventing the recognition of same-sex marriages could create
>>   difficulties for same-sex partners and their children; these have
>>   discouraged affected members of our community from participating
>>   at the IETF meeting in November of 2017 and have also influenced
>>   others to decline to attend in principled solidarity with them.
>> 
>> 
>>   Accordingly, the IETF has decided to postpone indefinitely the meeting
>>   in Singapore and is pursuing alternative venues.”
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Recentattendees mailing list
> Recentattendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees