IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-01.txt

Steve Baillargeon <steve.baillargeon@ericsson.com> Mon, 02 April 2012 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <steve.baillargeon@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0E21F861A for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Dh37ThnFc36 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imr3.ericy.com (imr3.ericy.com [198.24.6.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E771B21F8619 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 09:04:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) by imr3.ericy.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q32G4Cvx002343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:04:19 -0500
Received: from EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.55]) by eusaamw0711.eamcs.ericsson.se ([147.117.20.178]) with mapi; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 12:04:17 -0400
From: Steve Baillargeon <steve.baillargeon@ericsson.com>
To: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 12:04:14 -0400
Thread-Topic: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-01.txt
Thread-Index: Ac0Q2ji9zm3VhUfBQ0+EWy/hCkVRtgADhUKg
Message-ID: <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF178ACB2AD5@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
References: <4F742D2D.4060408@uijterwaal.nl> <4F74397D.4050902@uijterwaal.nl> <201204021408.q32E8YEo001358@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <201204021408.q32E8YEo001358@alpd052.aldc.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 16:04:22 -0000

Hi
 
>>>The authors published -value-added-octets with a WG document filename(which confuses things, it has not represented WG consensus at   any stage)

My take on it is that it is OK for an Informational RFC: a subset did the work, the entire WG was asked to review the write-up.


>>>The authors modified the draft to adopt the function of asymmetrical packet size test capability and possibly other functions identified in the problem statement draft.

The only field we added in 03 is Desired Reverse Padding Length. We showed a prototype @ IETF-80, people came up with suggestions, we showed that our prototype could be extended.


>>>The authors now claim to have simplified their protocol, after discounting the WG's comments on the complexity of their approach for about a year.

The only field we removed in 03 is the Sender Discriminator since it is not specifically related to capacity measurements. Sender Discriminator looked like a good idea at the time @ IETF80 but then wasn't used during our demo and is now dropped.


Regards
Steve B

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email