IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Wed, 20 April 2011 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CDE0698 for <ippm@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:38:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fIEOxi-1cGYb for <ippm@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCCEE0697 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3K7cjxQ012842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:38:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4DAE8D85.1080900@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:38:45 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ippm@ietf.org
References: <4C7CBBFD.1030402@ripe.net> <4D677893.2050200@ripe.net> <4D9C23B1.8040205@uijterwaal.nl> <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF0DEC35172D@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4383945B8C24AA4FBC33555BB7B829EF0DEC35172D@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: Re: [ippm] WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:38:48 -0000

Steve, others,

> - General comment. Have you considered
> defining a MIB as well your draft? As far as I know, the IETF has always
> favored the reporting of stats in well-defined MIB. I think it will help to
> compare performance reports from different implementations.

There have been proposals for a MIB in the past.  However, there was very
little interest to actually work on this as well as a lack of expertise
in the group.  The topic was dropped.  Of course, it can be restarted
if there is enough critical mass to work it.

Henk


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
RIPE NCC                                  http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email