Re: [ippm] End of WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt

Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl> Thu, 28 April 2011 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D69E06B6 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gbQorlTVgMon for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218FCE068D for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from geir.local (thuis.uijterwaal.nl [82.95.178.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3SBfTkp009036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ippm@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:41:30 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from henk@uijterwaal.nl)
Message-ID: <4DB95269.9090102@uijterwaal.nl>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:41:29 +0200
From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@uijterwaal.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
References: <4C7CBBFD.1030402@ripe.net> <4D677893.2050200@ripe.net> <4D9C23B1.8040205@uijterwaal.nl> <4DAE8E72.9020909@uijterwaal.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4DAE8E72.9020909@uijterwaal.nl>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: Re: [ippm] End of WGLC for draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ippm>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:42:03 -0000

Stas and Martin,

Please take a look at this.

Henk


On 20/04/2011 09:42, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
> IPPM group,
> 
>> As discussed in Prague, this starts a WGLC for the draft:
>>
>>       Reporting IP Performance Metrics to Users
>>       draft-ietf-ippm-reporting-06.txt
>>
>> Please review the draft and raise any issues by Wednesday, April 20, 8:00 UTC.
>> An URL for the draft is:
>>
>>     http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ippm-reporting/?include_text=1
> 
> The WGLC just ended.   There were a few issues raised by Steve Baillargeon.
> Authors: please answer this mail in the next days and submit an -07 if
> needed.
> 
> Henk
> 
> 


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk(at)uijterwaal.nl
RIPE NCC                                  http://www.uijterwaal.nl
                                          Phone: +31.6.55861746
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There appears to have been a collective retreat from reality that day.
                                 (John Glanfield, on an engineering project)