IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com> Fri, 26 July 2019 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FACB120044 for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d7Y5tpubVKKx for <ippm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D09112003E for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m23so51762167lje.12 for <ippm@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=neVNrYaqTEP8VDeCUXYxZr0iQx8fzddfWxM3kOgu5pE=; b=JZHE3QXWd6uE+iRDqqPUxgkmafDb87UYCRiMSB9DFKx/UNvqxoMAdaPk7aobIZudWA xW0Gd9JjFvuSbY+KyORz+jwXB5YXyyupYBhc13RvP6bAt3RHJq9/s3Vb3siSP5DCmCD5 H3TwE8EPy7ypUQ+H7ur8RkERcT7G61XFX6Nqo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=neVNrYaqTEP8VDeCUXYxZr0iQx8fzddfWxM3kOgu5pE=; b=itPecJYDH4n0HFrz9OrQD+kGvdlhJkDaOlzxz6OMVSUroTk9Cj9iGIaeCFmkUx+fv0 mbQBWwsAPrmoCBx5MlIvT/Pa7evDfgkPViS+c3a0CQ+cj923H/wJ5M7nAKUdz8W730I5 HKvSl+pxlO0tGiu4jBNCnrYxPB+iv+6N7vkp4aBTVKS/7ICUnsSHeY0RViBQe/YUbVkM Jm4cdM1YlFdTluGrdIsul3hCnxZzZzz3FX20hS9Hde13yR9sJvejShfQVv+yT7zBL4so KXHS9WEukOLaKNsbwmi25yeo0tDKmCS2Mp2oM+vHuJqJQois87gcs7hb+9rUjuSw8dH8 ACew==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUK81AQcdfZoqjJGducsNpxFY3yb+kVc2RHxeMoQLZm00ho8Utl fqrfxg2zwj1bjoA3NK1/HVDIcJWoNSKTjQdz/KN+Ww==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6ctOC7o/hIBkhbBnEoYhSJpyjuUJCkWiuWnweZrSd4J11vjjOrZoeu2aQ+Nbq3UPx5eKJMN1QgDvjOTUPktk=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9250:: with SMTP id v16mr49419644ljg.89.1564154446763; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch>
From: John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:20:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPOJaHxzH6iQkkNAamOSSzBD32fRvni4Mpyn9uxptp0=o9UXvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Cc: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c850f058e9716d4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/LtTU2lOLigoRYvovr1Y7z6IRovw>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:20:56 -0000

I support WG adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags.

John (co-author)


On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:07 AM Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
wrote:

> hi Greg,
>
> Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way.
> Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before
> publishing the update.
>
> This adoption call starts now.
>
> IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing
> list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a
> working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone
> "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement
> methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we
> end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this
> milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list
> explaining why.
>
> Thanks, cheers,
>
> Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
>
>
> > On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Chairs, et al.,
> > I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the
> decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not
> directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document.
> The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments.
> I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the
> charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Greg
>
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email