Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Yes, I support WG adoption.
Best Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian Trammell (IETF)
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 8:07 PM
To: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Subject: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

hi Greg,

Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way. Authors: let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before publishing the update.

This adoption call starts now.

IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing list of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working group document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a Standards Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG" (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the IESG, we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not support this, please send a message to the list explaining why.

Thanks, cheers,

Brian (as IPPM co-chair)

> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Chairs, et al.,
> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material not directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the document. The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many comments. I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to the charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
> 
> Regards,
> Greg

_______________________________________________
ippm mailing list
ippm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm