Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags

Parviz Yegani <pyegani@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2019 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <pyegani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ippm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC5A12010D; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f5tsFMm8IxJn; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78F612008A; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id k20so133081515ios.10; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JdUpYx5JVmNNBGh32S92hM6lgcFfPouahIeTccp2Fks=; b=ELeyNC743U0PncrvQ4zfgM845vO3VuW+VtklbPOSK+D77mZIXfJvoey2gBD56ikrht MucQenzG2jphTkfU8YLm2rZT2ejnDKiN85GVuERzSRYijQ2w7GOBCB4hTDre/k66+IjM zfZTwq/gm/BC7UROl9tZf6uRB/BnyBzO1C/0LXha5dMq5EFtKdPxwiRbUIsxd91m0CcL AB+kdTizasEUHpndniaTw4BgY6WnFjnb3tQviI77/0S0IbLh1sI1gheYTzdeBXY4E07m RELIuOTTawh/wo5DReValcC2iehFW6tdr5BeNrNiK8qkGDKYvCK4JL34WxXXi36PHf73 wCsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JdUpYx5JVmNNBGh32S92hM6lgcFfPouahIeTccp2Fks=; b=t/BrK8XLF0uoZFgROI5FkAY4FJxyk0fTciK2acO/zuNAB0efUF1VGMrdAwS+nowxJv oMvN0LDc8qi2mh8zyKGGL1TmY5PnPogSzavoz6YNdtwZicYBH1+nZb5RfxVjHSgg9KXl JNqjRN02h+V/pwCVz5su3bKWfEHbgI8McvRvhYiPsbrLCkhktibqoPcI5aCqZld92DO/ 6MYRhRlD6ELC61D/UEhi7U3PVeCqB2YMgb8dFsfxClyBNk6obG0TH4LY1wA11RxZalkQ QmEvyhIYjlQUBRKpgVOfiQLXeePZtUnGkRGqacIlyn6sRlTckGoAU3ciKP7yPetwGxPJ noNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUiL79dnLgyI+Rd47R+oaKmVXsS4GRbPy6urxNlAIFSfNXZ5IHi GOZHC7KbzJPn61sPC5qHBdBE8xcrhRTQajzRF9c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwWeBOxiF2vfHWHOmOi58owmfc7WzkEPh+WoI3nKLpo3QvHBtFAVPF+L1owLbVFsrt8FL0vEENF4yAdNoS37xA=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9711:: with SMTP id h17mr37593481iol.280.1564543374124; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+RyBmVnkMFEQv=Hr3y9OD09+_vocHRgnGQnLwEVO=yuTcptEQ@mail.gmail.com> <EAB5C70D-A160-423E-84FE-3CE7AC079168@trammell.ch> <4AC4BE58-D387-4230-974F-1E313AA49E45@cisco.com> <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEEF3C49@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEEF3C49@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Parviz Yegani <pyegani@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 20:22:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CANgDFrOV3jzv4GCq7EWejhX5dL8vRQa5fc8VQsmEmCGJ_VxyJg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
Cc: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>, IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000cef3b058ef1a415"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ippm/XxiIdj5Ni4Vq4dxrpNTL6-jvPfA>
Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re: Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
X-BeenThere: ippm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF IP Performance Metrics Working Group <ippm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ippm/>
List-Post: <mailto:ippm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm>, <mailto:ippm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 03:22:57 -0000

I support adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags.

Thanks,
Parviz

On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 7:57 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> wrote:

> I support wg adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags.
>
> Cheers,
> Tianran
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ippm [mailto:ippm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Pignataro
> > (cpignata)
> > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 12:10 PM
> > To: Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
> > Cc: IPPM Chairs <ippm-chairs@ietf.org>rg>; IETF IPPM WG <ippm@ietf.org>
> > Subject: Re: [ippm] Adoption call for draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags Re:
> > Regarding draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags
> >
> > Hi, Brian,
> >
> > I support adoption of draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags. This is an important
> > set of definition of flags for real uses based on experience. It fulfills
> > part of the charter milestone below complementing the base ioam-data,
> > realizing specific use cases, as an offspring document from ioam-data.
> >
> > I’m a co-author.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Carlos.
> >
> > > On Jul 25, 2019, at 2:07 PM, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the feedback; absolutely, we can do this the normal way.
> Authors:
> > let's do a normal two-week adoption call for this document before
> publishing
> > the update.
> > >
> > > This adoption call starts now.
> > >
> > > IPPM, please respond to this message with an indication to the mailing
> list
> > of your support for adopting draft-mizrahi-ippm-ioam-flags as a working
> group
> > document, in partial fulfillment of our charter milestone "submit a
> Standards
> > Track draft on inband OAM based measurement methodologies to the IESG"
> > (obviously, depending on how many documents we end up sending to the
> IESG,
> > we may have to change the plurality of this milestone). If you do not
> support
> > this, please send a message to the list explaining why.
> > >
> > > Thanks, cheers,
> > >
> > > Brian (as IPPM co-chair)
> > >
> > >
> > >> On 25 Jul 2019, at 13:15, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Dear Chairs, et al.,
> > >> I appreciate that editors of draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-data followed on the
> > decision of the WG reached at the meeting in Prague to extract material
> not
> > directly related to the definition of iOAM data elements from the
> document.
> > The new draft was presented earlier this week and generated many
> comments.
> > I feel that it would be right to discuss the draft and its relevance to
> the
> > charter of the IPPM WG before starting WG adoption poll.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Greg
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ippm mailing list
> > > ippm@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ippm mailing list
> > ippm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
> _______________________________________________
> ippm mailing list
> ippm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
>


-- 

-------------
Dr. Parviz Yegani
(408) 759-1973 mobile
pyegani@gmail.com