Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves

Abdussalam Baryun <> Tue, 17 December 2019 10:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC2512012C for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 02:57:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0f-Xl7DK1mw for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 02:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCEE12004C for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 02:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id c16so4324082oic.3 for <>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 02:57:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F9G302E1a0GyRyfCpdDS0jSUSSaNng2JJRTwE4WihlI=; b=C21f+3Gjrh2l3QZqqjCONh4wcvAetaEAKjrsAE2hZ1QzP9IXOcb8mtVR8FaqNQveBp DSKYV9E1GH1e/BgqSWH4XYgR0i/l/RVFoTJdytxlM/M4fM9XQTrV/EMMJsanNYrMAr5V 6DFsNDWtAT0dyM4MY3aVyPw66k3A8xowOZOOrfW+sLs21FMlHr0Ak+icrbckw1LcQByg 0mIwdv6YgU4tNOrXAIql65PzGoCiD6rp7y7ijWoJx956h3qv3gBbc+OWIItOJ8Ton7HY Lk+pEGVI9PMEPKt7n1UhD9mqq61PjWNhHpv4mEKT4xnoxrs38VmPpd3VZ/pHx9R1e3O7 9ryw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F9G302E1a0GyRyfCpdDS0jSUSSaNng2JJRTwE4WihlI=; b=Dlcsk6j5VI5FLzRUhvvHfMKXOa6TxmhxAR0ZHmld0py0KAk/SEkTaRp5e/E0/fTpPO SA22qFGaS5/16B+CFSljY1673waUc+vn/iHq3Gzs3+NLTvzyXnrbnE75SJ8eU2DTEJls q5sG1oXfqkrA9T7BPoR5eRZFTuD6O7C6XISQSwhNOj8UQTCRHOU58Fe+2R0wSDAuUdpX L6ln0LOMBmOoTOuxZDX9ftCeLl7Se9TlfVVvqBlvWiKlGogWmpyzTGkhfORZ0Ktw+tfx o07IWBaq7KIeR/620fJU9Gdol9ig/H8v9ZyvUgorS8XtyDBT3jGarb19mwj9kO1t5ZDg PwoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVxoFGuZQjQ4NXWe9M7FwNNRobRLh+HhLCW/LLqmWKt29InpTRS YdJRYb8YSeZ7bqgPadfybqyXcCw7szgtyzecMYI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzuNDyrh4TrpIutz2kCDl5aIthnKDG3iRFL4oCFVonDxt1uRqiShHusn/q+6zpgDiVpY1ai4nx3oCJVMV3NZso=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:6c5:: with SMTP id m5mr1103412oih.143.1576580227854; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 02:57:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 12:56:54 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <>
Cc: its <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000070f4f80599e43091"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 10:57:11 -0000

Hi Alex,

I think it is still a debate and not final decision, IMO it is not possible
change the spectrum while people are already using it and paid money for
it, therefore, it is only a future plan and may not be applied in all
locations in the US. Also I would like to know the opinion of US
participants on this issue please.


On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:59 AM Alexandre Petrescu <> wrote:

> Le 17/12/2019 à 01:01, Russ Housley a écrit :
> >
> [...]
> > The FCC plan would divide 75 MHz of the safety spectrum between WiFi
> > and auto safety applications. The FCC proposal allocates 20 MHz for a
> > newer V2X technology, known as C-V2X, and leaves 10 MHz for either
> > C-V2X or DSRC.

AB> they will need to deliver the technology and implement it,

It is indeed a plan that invites to think about the future.

An implementation of IPv6 over OCB that uses a 20MHz channel, instead of
10MHz, would no longer be 'illegal'.

I would like to ask whether FCC considers this potential C-V2X 20MHz
channel to still be free of use for everyone (like the current 5.9GHz
band) or will it be licensed and paid for? (like e.g. the 2.6 GHz band
of LTE).

AB> I think it should be like WiFi usedby all free,


> _______________________________________________
> its mailing list

its mailing list