Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Tue, 17 December 2019 11:05 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: its@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211D7120122 for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:05:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 78j-s4REyhjO for <its@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99621120088 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:05:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id b18so4729264otp.0 for <its@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:05:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=C7MEYOAc+axKvYOcRhfe5oQAvfU8gReIBrbYVISBgmc=; b=L9upWmsK8PGq7oNjxWqtnI2SIlTNgR6u/i3g2/cQ+IbWhaRTFbLkf5NOX6CddSzquF SbUEjcixrTIpMcnu6AXOoozTMBqd/kb0qsA2DQLy14Wpqkw6evIwv5acCizWqr1z0fVj aKifuvVRc98lEC5aGYRsWvdKJJ6d2O46u9VNYD6yNpvhzMUyK1yfjAZFUObi55au28a2 I8YdZ+thoW5imC8NtYSsCHmnGcu6rO6tAiQp7W1VC1MKZOQ1ecKEZRx002uAXnRzKJeH D3zDgiH0ncKUtgVtTXAtmygsc3Cz0uclzDgvRES1WQH84OMARRC6FM5C4fUB/6dehC7o mbtA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=C7MEYOAc+axKvYOcRhfe5oQAvfU8gReIBrbYVISBgmc=; b=ZR/KXTYncqiIgn2EfCoIjf710+9UQE1Jvzm05uZ8/R6ngUi470o4ULwT39mRkJfxP+ XqLzdA/iorHiYlX5agHhcQ/+nfuicCdOLeyOBODfDVcsbnadt/8zj5E2M1dP13tGFpiM bqFtxSPeZRiNBb1g9qUNhOmIusQzOLxS5CFaYxOLbSr7EHvCebj5+LwfhY1I3c1Z0OIL bLzlCEXyb8P9xG1Ii4ESs6vsrVRzokNzHLbNKwtJR4mfan8v2Wq06n0DCVDVUVQM6EBk IdG1dPBzOGO1wmKGZvosJtONHuhXVTeUnCXjf+ggIf5TioQRVsHty3H1Ajyl1iyE/FZJ NzOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVW2pJM8wF6G6OueHS4g7JCg6Tc52dfyNdzOgWt9PsH4/mW4Jpg rsWjGLHHnzc+8deRgTRGDwfrqiU19l0bA7wFwybeIg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzLGjW/ao9P55DnA53L2d+0moQv7hqeqrdx+U6W+vq8GVqTfrZyZkHW3FBv3YoNbtCnE0fFk6w2cSGZNGTswAc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:147:: with SMTP id j7mr21649508otp.44.1576580747132; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 03:05:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <EED81985-1D4C-41B2-8CCA-A46B96390A18@vigilsec.com> <c680bd31-5f87-6fc9-60c8-2a0af9787483@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_aW4x4LevDY9DGCDic6OpA1==WcVKb9S+1x93apjBYDw@mail.gmail.com> <cfe932bc-999d-1d68-f657-52c8e24d5c6b@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cfe932bc-999d-1d68-f657-52c8e24d5c6b@gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 13:05:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88zRZQkYZOEAUxSQcQSWyRTj3gMGCRcAw-ZAauYBHZ2-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: its <its@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006482530599e44f1b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/its/gHJzJ_xj5u7hsW90kYAENjlx0K8>
Subject: Re: [ipwave] FCC Moves Plan Forward to Chop Up Vehicle Safety Airwaves
X-BeenThere: its@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPWAVE - IP Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments WG at IETF <its.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/its/>
List-Post: <mailto:its@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its>, <mailto:its-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:05:50 -0000

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:59 PM Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> have people elsewhere paid money to get a license to talk in the 5.9GHz
> space?
>
in the article is says the tax payers will be apposing because the cities
already used money for the  DSRC, and it mentions that FCC plan will KILL
and waste a lot of money of city investment by city covernment.

AB

> (not in Europe a single person paid such money)
>
> Le 17/12/2019 à 11:56, Abdussalam Baryun a écrit :
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I think it is still a debate and not final decision, IMO it is not
> > possible change the spectrum while people are already using it and paid
> > money for it, therefore, it is only a future plan and may not be applied
> > in all locations in the US. Also I would like to know the opinion of US
> > participants on this issue please.
> >
> > AB
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:59 AM Alexandre Petrescu
> > <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >     Le 17/12/2019 à 01:01, Russ Housley a écrit :
> >      >
> >
> https://www.consumerreports.org/car-safety/fcc-moves-plan-forward-to-chop-up-vehicle-safety-airwaves/
> >     [...]
> >      > The FCC plan would divide 75 MHz of the safety spectrum between
> WiFi
> >      > and auto safety applications. The FCC proposal allocates 20 MHz
> for a
> >      > newer V2X technology, known as C-V2X, and leaves 10 MHz for either
> >      > C-V2X or DSRC.
> >
> >
> > AB> they will need to deliver the technology and implement it,
> >
> > It is indeed a plan that invites to think about the future.
> >
> > An implementation of IPv6 over OCB that uses a 20MHz channel, instead of
> > 10MHz, would no longer be 'illegal'.
> >
> > I would like to ask whether FCC considers this potential C-V2X 20MHz
> > channel to still be free of use for everyone (like the current 5.9GHz
> > band) or will it be licensed and paid for? (like e.g. the 2.6 GHz band
> > of LTE).
> >
> > AB> I think it should be like WiFi usedby all free,
> >
> > Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > its mailing list
> >  > its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>
> >  > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
> >  >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > its mailing list
> > its@ietf.org <mailto:its@ietf.org>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/its
>