IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 18 March 2014 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF551A03BC for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tYxN1NQG_PK for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7791A0147 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s2IFRao0008792; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:27:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5489361B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.137.54.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C7632AD; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:27:35 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:27:30 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 416849250.746485-0d5206b20b905ccd49cf800c4822378b
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A39BEF13-C267-44C7-BDF6-88C86F27AC08@tzi.org>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de> <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/4LYKaKqe_Zm5iv9uxoLpiBS_uMY
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 15:27:53 -0000

On 18 Mar 2014, at 16:14, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> wrote:

> I don't remember that discussion. draft-ietf-appsawg-json-merge-patch should still be part of AppsAWG; it just needs someone to take over the work.

Since I wrote a somewhat detailed review of that draft in December (and implemented it in the process to understand it better), I have talked to James about possibly acting as an editor.  

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email