IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 18 March 2014 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AB31A06E1 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ekLiFszXSFPa for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45CC1A06EA for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvDpe-1X8X5z31ve-010Ilt; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:28:53 +0100
Message-ID: <53287443.2060405@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:28:51 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com> <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de> <EC3168FE-EA36-4036-8B36-974FDA7BD88E@vpnc.org> <532864FC.8040700@gmx.de> <CE6D04D1-C063-41E6-A635-3AD8127B6F28@vpnc.org> <5328687D.9050509@gmx.de> <CAHBU6ivhKzENAEkm174=o=QYs8Xj1BS4Rfw0CX_C6bnNP2riNw@mail.gmail.com> <53286A3E.3000907@gmx.de> <53286BE2.3020409@cisco.com> <82F6EE3B-B659-460C-AD1C-7303D4F53333@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <82F6EE3B-B659-460C-AD1C-7303D4F53333@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:E3m2MKgfljAjwvMjdLvlWBXGAi9l1j/6lx1Lr5Pw2drrzLBDJ+j IYb5Hfd8iA7NyXnSqjH93DgwoLFeEGkAkXu7KEhDVAAOGjFWq0277GvJ1BuB5S8eje/zPBE uDugAtZ4evAAOtZMyL56SN+REbu8RKsY8hO6fbDOLbpg+61icnc2A+LzqseNOY8eSAOdY7b AsnRB/H13DtqnI7kkfpNg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/sbI0HCexRRnt0S8v7At_Ua5UGY4
Cc: IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 16:29:05 -0000

On 2014-03-18 17:19, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2014, at 16:53, Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Teams I have worked with are already making use of json-merge-patch,
>
> Are they using exactly what’s in the draft right now (including the somewhat surprising purge_nulls semantics)?
> It would help to get some feedback from actual users of this.
> ...

q.e.d. :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email