IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 18 March 2014 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878F61A066C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vTOeb25JCKTt for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC441A0666 for <json@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 00:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.117] ([93.217.98.154]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LmKag-1WyJu626Mc-00ZwdP; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:06:08 +0100
Message-ID: <5327F05E.7060905@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:06:06 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matt Miller <mamille2@cisco.com>, IETF JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
References: <53277484.70305@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53277484.70305@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bd6blAWG5mWLNb6qs2jbUCbMMS77/Yo3GV6fM+JVmt31dxhTwL+ a6+B3K6PphejO/02ggkrApp4gsD8NXGYTS8liiONdA+LsAB9xoCZ1nH4R7CeEUSCmx/kTvV DQWzFORgIW/bjJOwQNL2NFWmVpkMsc273JrFUQfK4s4u1pjSC/hb2WzBr6aA5UB2Vl5HBI3 C79WS8slYmuKUzRIj3XMw==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/json/FBnECYvN9Hmjcl6EXsuD1eU71Ic
Subject: Re: [Json] Proposed Wording for New WG Charter
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json/>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:06:21 -0000

On 2014-03-17 23:17, Matt Miller wrote:
> Greetings again.  We earlier asked a couple of questions to gauge what
> the new proposed WG charter ought to contain.  That feedback has been
> valuable, but has drilled into implementation specifics before a new
> charter was actually agreed on!  We have been chastised by our AD about
> this, and for good reason.  We think we already have enough input from
> the London meeting and the list over the past few days to make the
> following proposal for a new charter:
> ...

What happened to the proposal to add James Snell's json-merge draft to 
the list of WG items?

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email