[Json] Proposal: the minimal edit

[R S <[e-mail]>]

>From charter:

"The work is essentially a reclassification in place, with minimal changes.
The working group will review errata and update the document as needed
to incorporate
those, and will correct significant errors and inconsistencies, but will
keep changes to a minimum."

I propose a new section, to appear after "Generators" and before "IANA
Considerations"

+ N. Differences from ECMAScript
+
+ ECMAScript implementations produce and consume primitive JSON values at
the
+ root level of JSON documents.

It's my opinion that none of the errors or inconsistencies present in the
document are significant, since JSON works pretty well. I'll probably
oppose any edits that aren't to the introduction or the security
considerations, including updates to references such as ABNF and Unicode.
Note that the IETF does not update all standards track documents with
obsolete references, which demonstrates that leaving the current references
in place is tractable.

- Rob