IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2335CC14F736 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sAlzL_JxGteY for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7458C14F6E1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 10:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-695df25699fso43578776d6.2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712079936; x=1712684736; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=MH/cFJr4mMLSZWl41AJSYh+vrcvbg4zuNcgmqwki2D8=; b=Ytk7HWdqD2BLuVtXdToSzsHnOt+aFObS3uBfiYjmDflZxNqLqnE6geSB97m0Fspqlh rXH1/aofuEM0ITrCzYh7VmJinfH86Z6S2FfSQR2ZVsfa8CUyA8DrEDagPzj7bolG+Cg2 woRruL5CgISDmg5yRDauNQOqDVMBOsLgqskYz4BE3PqskoYXxYqs388PVecSH10mq2jX IhlgfcGhORSFGb90Uhygldjec2ult8k+wo3NfvgT/ESncjJi8dcn6yqojPE624J2m9+/ 0UIAl5G7OGcfet3h/2KyuEaI8+S4g67gCkKxMaVOO3lK+Kd31KygJBGb+xKri3mgMvcH IHyg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712079936; x=1712684736; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=MH/cFJr4mMLSZWl41AJSYh+vrcvbg4zuNcgmqwki2D8=; b=tzN7YL2rR3ZHPtB/DWyQBKd+uhAyY/Jbhx5U4vpd+ut1lO8iCO7vNv2/txoudAWn1Q a5gPrhiQ7/NS26saeOzt0ZE734yzudUS0GeXxQHBqgMntSMCzlhxNc+MsPZAWJ3NYe03 Wz0aeMJYnlsMbCvGUsldhTSr8Xe/VH2n1T35xiol5Sn/EDapg1URvincMiF8Nnc/YhQz LhGtZQuUy92FkUKrAXU6ZcKs2ecCoPKdKDLIhpDYm6DVVNDwjIzS7dhZxBAui0WFXGzi qVWj/WdlhHMZQB8jxUDA/2uHhaQRjPIC6OjolgxT8xkHd5XMZy7qP1h+CycJExNgMDUc 7hjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznZZ/KisrGFqHf4Tni+IxqyaUHxgrpSFmW/L9CHObhk5ZxYpOZ ZhniMkYo21H+fMJgOFRYbFkOfE5IDiJtEdYc8m2+/4Npx8QFom7i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEh4KL5T6x21Pxbgq3uTqbrfztd709AMYdx1RFsjXXtf5S9mGNcE3dExr4iyA+R1g5OCSum5g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2582:b0:699:10bb:3ad3 with SMTP id fq2-20020a056214258200b0069910bb3ad3mr5869502qvb.43.1712079935703; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2605:a601:918a:7600:c83d:a15e:a0be:d468]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jq6-20020ad45fc6000000b006960f65e08esm5692960qvb.132.2024.04.02.10.45.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 10:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
From: Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:45:33 -0400
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D192992F-4A88-4146-A942-98CB0C8AD052@gmail.com>
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/1gUwVF_3oMxLc_NXTFnNk_xOlfs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:45:46 -0000

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

Thanks,
Acee

> On Apr 2, 2024, at 1:00 PM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:
> 
> 
> [WG chair hat: on]
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.
> 
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with: 
> 
> “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> or
> 
> “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email