Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFBAC14F61E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:25:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qrolichb0jFx for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x634.google.com (mail-pl1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB31EC14F5F5 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x634.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e0878b76f3so4072675ad.0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:25:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712111145; x=1712715945; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pLa7Ha3h94TTMm2rqarDxMq6+D/kHzMSJTAAeXLk7mg=; b=WC4JppSYsEuMQrWKcy6T6ZCpJH0PVvhdD+DLyGpMUIcS8laf0A/K6a+uT63ZgTw0lZ NmCkxiXAJY0uNvSZpHrLGP6QyxmiBuUQqTxHqhDRK0P5JQaac2+C13CHeiAAHa+/QXVv ox2MHKan/AYWUcg5/pxBVQwQis8LXeVW9mDmNqd2GiAfEqWXANkWjntSlVfgOKys1b2W 2kUzo7BdRqqa+u0EMoBWOZeeSAtBduz3ns2GFz/q7NAObNwLCIneXHERShB6ke3Hk3Ng 1g5Uxbp1wpkaY2gnndkuFg/Wz3ehuVgQiEaNoGp6oV3yG95Wu5pUQYM7mI2utxzcqExz Y7uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712111145; x=1712715945; h=to:references:message-id:cc:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pLa7Ha3h94TTMm2rqarDxMq6+D/kHzMSJTAAeXLk7mg=; b=FGHbmmgEqe+8E6M3u47wRo+vQjkedb3VyuuyeR0vhazNSz5b3TU20ZZ9hpB6L0TJa1 IkqbMfTqXm86DqwTvlBeo+2eYVvuacZFNo5Jzy7UzAN2kVlPgoS3VbWfJpxOfPt34E+i PYhMlucsadhgN5xI6lut2HMgWrcYPaaCOYigN9+lEE6gfbQFjuN2vjWYGdfx/BaCz76c qnwgor4wW+B7LIEY8GVC6hzUEHEALzDvH64X5U+A6p+332Z1rnmfq7IWf8rur/GZf2yg X5OgAWBIfRGVv7ipoQALUWESMUbRz1iw8wdxx2nqY2UFZUxAPSH331BTJLguZ3oq5zcA F6qg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX4qXgg1fPriyoDAM4ATSOaTz9PwwvQrcmElIAWAD/jImESAgd3KPGdZ450tFn8OF6E/Lu7zTGz5XIH3YZE
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxCdJUGhWVkfe9bj5iUzzlzniUjixrD7nd7Gp1GsJJVFcs0rTbG lt/ttWXskMBUHPmFJ1JqqgHR6dz8RQZOtwZlVDJ/J/Jat9WSXksP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEc9FbaF04rG7E5B/6rSTu07OIAZ2lkeRb1gE+McL4IgoERC9iYXdd0Ok43Nd055ZgAc8ELSg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f7d1:b0:1e0:abdc:1507 with SMTP id h17-20020a170902f7d100b001e0abdc1507mr1257981plw.17.1712111144682; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([124.106.198.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t15-20020a170902e84f00b001e28eea8a72sm427828plg.185.2024.04.02.19.25.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <001301da8529$5f825020$1e86f060$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:25:32 +0800
Cc: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <F418D725-7198-4AEE-A71F-06704D0836D9@gmail.com>
References: <001301da8529$5f825020$1e86f060$@olddog.co.uk>
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21D61)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/swoojXnO25c4Dlfsql9mlWZWde0>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 02:25:49 -0000

I support making RFC 7506.

/Loa

Sent from my iPhone

> On 3 Apr 2024, at 02:13, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> If they give you lines...
> 
> I think it is a fine idea to move RFC 7506 to Historic status in keeping with what we have learned over the years and in consideration of the lspping-norao draft.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li
> Sent: 02 April 2024 18:01
> To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
> Subject: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
> 
> 
> [WG chair hat: on]
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.
> 
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with:
> 
>    “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> or
> 
>    “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls