IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

loa@pi.nu Wed, 03 April 2024 02:43 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E301C14F703 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.876
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR=0.01, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zfPI73-WFyM for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2EBC14F5FC for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:43:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pi.nu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C273A969C; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:43:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 124.106.198.177 (SquirrelMail authenticated user loa@pi.nu) by pi.nu with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:43:35 +0200
Message-ID: <d98834c1bfa4e938146da5c48306f2ef.squirrel@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <E7967533-7F8D-46CC-9126-ECFFFC32153D@tony.li>
References: <001301da8529$5f825020$1e86f060$@olddog.co.uk> <F418D725-7198-4AEE-A71F-06704D0836D9@gmail.com> <E7967533-7F8D-46CC-9126-ECFFFC32153D@tony.li>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:43:35 +0200
From: loa@pi.nu
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DdOsXSVtu9bOrC70eez1k4WgDLE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 02:43:45 -0000

Tony,

Sorry I thumb-type on my iPhone.

I meant to say:

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

/Loa

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
> Hi Loa,
>
> I’m sorry, but I don’t know how to interpret this response.
>
> Tony
>
>
>> On Apr 2, 2024, at 7:25 PM, Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I support making RFC 7506.
>>
>> /Loa
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 02:13, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>> If they give you lines...
>>>
>>> I think it is a fine idea to move RFC 7506 to Historic status in
>>> keeping with what we have learned over the years and in consideration
>>> of the lspping-norao draft.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li
>>> Sent: 02 April 2024 18:01
>>> To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option)
>>> to historic
>>>
>>>
>>> [WG chair hat: on]
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert
>>> Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to
>>> Historic.
>>>
>>> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please
>>> reply-all with:
>>>
>>>   “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>>   “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>>>
>>> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tony
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mpls mailing list
>>> mpls@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email