IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2024 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B8DC151552 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qn1unARdpmCr for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED61C15154F for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a2e5d86254so302636a91.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712238055; x=1712842855; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PiPtd+1FHD+ESTOo3b1kllJf1dsg6R8jFn8dPYSAkW0=; b=NqnuOofyISZ7tLj5v/uZn0S0stBAl3NjP0fV73TfLmRm4I0G4Cg7hemzpvHBiCGMA+ 7Ah3oSThZG0aqySDR91jSMKXeWOFCfEMBw/wL55FXm2M0OnCGwHgCSu1uF5N+J6Wkv7J cQrXmCiADr5Ea207Dn0AJtJi9cEertfjrD64HA92t6J2NHJ2Hkk9ExsU1fKQQwhWLLlP DQA4ngp8qi5hMt9yQ+OA6n5j5ZQ4EHaRjC56+xUwDEaaHTUSN4fxrPeqUvU9yo9qv9vX GPbZGvmJtU67//8x0wNu4lpzd52dvGAccPljs6Twg0+l8h5PCy0pFRBMAthACe7u6G9r lHyQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712238055; x=1712842855; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=PiPtd+1FHD+ESTOo3b1kllJf1dsg6R8jFn8dPYSAkW0=; b=VMaaCtnCg93D5mmjqvaBW063BmUnJ3QqTIKpWNgv7PnUuVWKRMJL2Y1/6umcWa3cgT Epva+rV69ihrSAfXot/zH/aTNUyvpUrO+gZyA2y5SbPPovWbEijQLBHhfIO7vjhQjlBj dL+fMPz0J+/DhJH4nUYaVKx1PWUY9qcjRj1KJ+RNhjfKosySSAeE+TJ59+uRIRayR/Is fN93ST2mrD1m2okt6J+t2ow8+speED8wO6lmgyrwIOlv/EuKYVH8CbH4CIYdf9ZV/yZ7 pJxUt5DWLNQzVg3JForCve7+dAm5MIQZ8BY8KT95DxGePmdBcinhWWZXmgI24OehyoEg fNlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtI47YJN1wsItCTM94qOLp51lXon4OIbfHhe5op2B0pjngDGHF vvrjdETyQzOrraDV3+hpldX+3ka5yKnVAPenDl3PyAa8XjKEEaONz4gZLS/+Ewixwv3glBK4dfi ujJlish1/aaBQW6/8PK9yY6btDB2dJREYfgA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfzBXqV+xpRdGdGh1aFNept0qjmiGpufBYuypzSs8vlf2IXakZDbwQtkMV7JnVADqSIvwDv4YES8YYCpe5NyQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:db86:b0:2a2:6244:32b5 with SMTP id h6-20020a17090adb8600b002a2624432b5mr3960299pjv.11.1712238055196; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 06:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 19:10:43 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuugXHuJMJkGUFZ+uRa6+EMRR5gYMdKg8E_CHcW1Kzjvw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d12070615457da4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wPcTW2pLeeT0jMUowvwShu8DYwQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 13:40:58 -0000

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

Regards,
-Pavan

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:31 PM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert
> Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to
> Historic.
>
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please
> reply-all with:
>
>         “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> or
>
>         “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email