IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com> Wed, 10 April 2024 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE14C14F5E7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pGEwfo8XlYMH for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956BDC14F5E3 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-78ebc7e1586so25355285a.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712783039; x=1713387839; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TWzHkTt0YDHvsYnd8jkes6pXj8xVTr1WzcoOL+tHio8=; b=UXoKb0Kv1iMBd9invUdu3Fdmhes3HqFTKoRbQRRHX4m51d2wePQR/Jg2TThABrkm1w x1+53uYSfro13QLyzvGrsepZo6O1NgcVW2GTxhATEKW7qSAEzVjpm1s7p3RD1DTIkiMX aHllW/FD4j9JkgnYo+d49QIhTZxeMEjAcO/I1dBJDyuwLk+0mILuwN9kCytrGHL2/H5X SqKi0EEEfyrUZWH9wMBwPKtuJdIkc6QHJE4BMUMBVZp/ekITiiKiGHxYJLjEu2besp2o 47cDTOnGWHtj83vWcFNNyVjXXrWmtL+sgUVdabFVIbmoGpRnPL2lb+SPo7PlOarItIbG ml6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712783039; x=1713387839; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TWzHkTt0YDHvsYnd8jkes6pXj8xVTr1WzcoOL+tHio8=; b=sQaD9h/X1oSNn9G1LMgYFjBgn38HAD8549i34qcFAEV9e1kU8u3S9U9dk9jmGH/wuI Aqq8nqkdvqoTEQO6suBAYiTGN4TIeRIUWE7unnsB6RDX752NdP6pS94puvbUaPLLxQPg FPSB1AcbSulO+k6mr92gWM9l6fmuk0IM/GIJXs0q3A+reQ79CDXx6Olo4iLN0cNrb/IV fIFpoVIlqUnjbx5grxGMhpAO7ydZm9V/o4PCQXuI55N2xzekWAYy/qdUFX1JeQiD+eWA uH9dd6BbhVTUvkVntW+gak+vPy8j3fBwzJ8l+Qd441L+Nbc8awEEd3GYVIMkdLgm1knq HBUA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV3YEsN8v55yOBTKxTmaB+K57F9NwWHHS5hOOXjJs6umSBAX4ZtRqfMwsnY7AI90Nsgu8aAPgWLeJHlAF6F
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzmc4XzRN+5BxDmXoGG7rkqMhyFWao3psEWfA/JUpPQ8UWJilPk hcA1GvbG1n8xQvfPsXNpB5bQ57rA/dM3MvbVQc4dPUihlnBP9faa
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG5VWWGkrO3gzCLTTxMvsiBDP5id/+tB/JCcqSEOsyLUOS0nVu3DYSTCQKgEGBbB3vxbAN7/g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4548:b0:78d:3ebb:aaca with SMTP id u8-20020a05620a454800b0078d3ebbaacamr1024064qkp.20.1712783039056; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([136.56.7.30]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h9-20020a05620a400900b0078d68175f32sm60615qko.134.2024.04.10.14.03.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Apr 2024 14:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Carlos Pignataro <cpignata@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E88F74E0-DCA9-4036-AFE6-08C8DF55841D@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2176EFDF-723B-4AF3-8C65-DBECD9A5FC00"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 17:03:47 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4QFiNXxBNhKR0cSnSW1kwn-JLXexpmuv8kQwxV4Kwbcw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li> <CAB75xn4QFiNXxBNhKR0cSnSW1kwn-JLXexpmuv8kQwxV4Kwbcw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7RaIawPg0S0Sc7Nujh4TpvDaVT4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:04:04 -0000

Tony,

I also support moving RFC 7506 to historic — as one of the authors of RFC 7506.

Dhruv,

One question regarding your review of draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-08.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-on-designating-rfcs-as-historic-20140720/ mentions three ways to classify a document as Historic. It seems options 2 and 3 can be done with an I-D (option 1 via an AD). What is the need to move it to Historic *before* and in order to allow draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao progressing?

Thanks,

Carlos.


> On Apr 3, 2024, at 2:51 AM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic. 
> 
> As one of the reviewers of draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-08 [1], this needs to be done before we can progress the I-D.  
> 
> Thanks! 
> Dhruv
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-06-rtgdir-lc-dhody-2024-02-05/
> 
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:31 PM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li <mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:
>> 
>> [WG chair hat: on]
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.
>> 
>> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with: 
>> 
>>         “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>> 
>> or
>> 
>>         “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>> 
>> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tony
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email