IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 06:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBA8C14F702 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GlFcpvw3x1m3 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D096C14F694 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id ada2fe7eead31-476d13e405fso2058410137.0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712127154; x=1712731954; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cWcDAn05Js/dRm6ofuWRoFj+sUtiX7iJfvNkemvUTgY=; b=BmKVgb5r7mGQbL251U+N+y4QbQpEGVSlrvRzSFO2GaGegCxtTd5ZJc/kCQV5/+8lph tIWoDaiLYrFo/u27wb2MuuVNu7gJpwfRYLjCXSi6iMuh9LfVOFKTdpoYRPL71ZbkMK7p MzhjkoBgqZN5VyLE3vaL7qLJRhoIrREKwpNXKLp8WS2py2moetSyOaecd/IEZZNG5/jh yMXFTOR+gWUWbJr/HEn1YLTJlHpT26yPPCHYXu/iuoaI6S0BzdGtB40P/PGFwuQ3woU4 qnDqaTULpVOz2YHKihI19BuByGhZ8gElKGaTRrO6LF178HiCLEZbjGCSKDjSKNTf5kfF EDCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712127154; x=1712731954; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=cWcDAn05Js/dRm6ofuWRoFj+sUtiX7iJfvNkemvUTgY=; b=J5y2yTuZ6xGMktZcEJ89VK3rFvPoR8fCSFEkUgRhxaaTHieeMP9OGCdMWYZ/mZ8AO5 ZCCLBfFV/zCypoOx6evyqOtNlEqeS6B3oh5h2jcPeml9wTNQ65KIAO1NAR+ewO2rAaxZ EMlrQM4YDvkIqUojg8HN5Si9puiiFc9KdLnaGaKggNukjYIAHi+kQ1FQJL/OJub9AxiU wXfRWVOJw7jvts5d5cmUeHsw292jB+o/i21b5uhdS+nt+0S+jrBggA954J9KFo610Lx+ rpO7YGVYGDNgTN1vnfqLO1UhFeIOS6X0X+COzYhDqhCEHLWUIZMKMkjoU/09sBxZ8BvC cG5Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxjx1FlxLPZTaUpSfVLjl6PRirH4RSHd9/TGpq9ucN1H0HAH3Ff 8rT8/wrQDh+HDUo9Thzd6lGZcDFAMqvCFIJPAlxf5TS/E404bch7ukmAefrR92OyW6QvBbUJh7/ sAov5fqay7KdchLowjPu47CLki7gKKeJxP+cOfA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEIBuZHMOauCCsEW+iHqaFMpcGNPn6aBqiOwgtGGlLfe68YbfjLo2FRBRUXC4cHn5gpX+Et7fsGGDW2Ljl3E/M=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f159:0:b0:478:3fc9:3b43 with SMTP id t25-20020a67f159000000b004783fc93b43mr11824601vsm.4.1712127154058; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:52:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 12:21:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn4QFiNXxBNhKR0cSnSW1kwn-JLXexpmuv8kQwxV4Kwbcw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d400e306152baa01"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/7mU4Kn3hmwR0fI6AvrG6NBMFh88>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:52:39 -0000

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

As one of the reviewers of draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-08 [1], this needs
to be done before we can progress the I-D.

Thanks!
Dhruv
[1]
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-06-rtgdir-lc-dhody-2024-02-05/

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:31 PM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert
> Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to
> Historic.
>
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please
> reply-all with:
>
>         “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> or
>
>         “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email