IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 16 April 2024 21:17 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85072C14CE2B for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IrFN3FUitECb for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1FCC14F684 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a526803fccso2866516a91.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713302254; x=1713907054; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CLLJuqedrFdTclW6QSWdgwmjhIE0I1jHkpIcP1O3KsI=; b=Wd5TEHXV56MFz83MlvMOlIXJ9vSNRwiSA0vAeW1GJBQsoBpoobt9KCsItPX0Nsvito drmHKWjcIEAppUsxc/zfOY+Cu/ZWyvMHKs5TYKR+a/Vre7cfwykdxaR8MI4bQQW+F8qv 3k5fMVTBBFFbua9gsw81Hh5V/GWADx8dsQyUehTqeNB7kNAc+CYNN4TihBsIZ9KB0BHa bMmkvxK1AbbrWoZ0y53juGWduvXAOJXg9aI+VtnHJ9gSQKLVNIZbL2PIxdFlSvzmpWmk Gn31ToDqCRafC+Tn1A3H7YdaBlEGrGncDssKHIxwIfG10lAvLndgCUd5q27wCiYIuJYo ECjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713302254; x=1713907054; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=CLLJuqedrFdTclW6QSWdgwmjhIE0I1jHkpIcP1O3KsI=; b=MaokR+H27dz6vckC1UpSR8u6uwmcnbAKaG1bk8tdDg07smDm1e4Mpv7BHqXedf0YGA 4gGsUs28r/Ez5ldSpu3dO0q2dsebkBX2jB3itjN/mPEZTmWFyLicoSnwR+CDlw3NskBA P2Uuup3hW/9FDa7h1kqgRtrGUe03rBC1aQDTruyFE3mw8veGQHb8KdQwsugn5nfgjX9u NvPRTlO79Mq/7v1TQwdoCeg4Oq8Eee4+UBL9Oo9SEIQh21DeinHxzfFeADM9ZRIfW32B SW9S6GDWQwl62ljr/E9lmENrreyTi9PL2WFLbgKap9rngZAqsvifxStVMSqEXnGYNadT aNHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyhc8n0vUq9gzTPc8KUFDHEuxWD4br1IhUwvZtJIz89FY3MGPDp CKKzrWuMvvvh5pJTS6A62dlc932Z68UaVpMhQoUEtkvIUjY653VmfYZBp7LVZOr8PFM7VtCmY4q 2XcVXB411RTNkR/hRsDhQtiuOSDk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGnR6QFXjQIWpTYuCcYoEgXBY40+8AhMKpHsbSXNOKkTnkRJkVlYtn5iKadgZv3Ef+GTZVUn32Exa52P6D5ZSg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1089:b0:2a2:f25c:c250 with SMTP id c9-20020a17090a108900b002a2f25cc250mr13914203pja.11.1713302253665; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:17:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 17:17:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU2vYoDCVE2FucTzmJKGV-n17aPoJ3nPC9TuQVHWBkmqZw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000039035706163d4483"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/T5p82tDiQJkyJkMQKqxGZf8p-Ec>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 21:17:38 -0000

Tony,

Sounds good to me!

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 1:01 PM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert
> Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to
> Historic.
>
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please
> reply-all with:
>
>         “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> or
>
>         “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email