IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC03C14F605 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 02:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1wqL_sEHJil for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 02:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B64E9C14F603 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 02:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.216]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V8g0J01Zfz6D9QV; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:47:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.162.219]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84887140DAF; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:52:21 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.196) by lhrpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.219) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 10:52:20 +0100
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.31) by dggpemm100006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.196) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:52:18 +0800
Received: from kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) by kwepemd100004.china.huawei.com ([7.221.188.31]) with mapi id 15.02.1258.028; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 17:52:17 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
CC: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
Thread-Index: AQHahR+SCmyrqIBPC0GdztGufvFn7rFVlnuAgAC4gNw=
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:52:17 +0000
Message-ID: 9216DEC6-2F4D-4DFC-AB94-B35410473418
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>, <CAB75xn4QFiNXxBNhKR0cSnSW1kwn-JLXexpmuv8kQwxV4Kwbcw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn4QFiNXxBNhKR0cSnSW1kwn-JLXexpmuv8kQwxV4Kwbcw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9216DEC62F4D4DFCAB94B35410473418_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/f94Mvw9CIY_CWDlV7GGmSUQtLWw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 09:52:28 -0000

I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

-Jie

发件人：Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>>
收件人：Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>>
抄 送：mpls <mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>>
时 间：2024-04-03 14:54:02
主 题：Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

As one of the reviewers of draft-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-08 [1], this needs to be done before we can progress the I-D.

Thanks!
Dhruv
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-mpls-lspping-norao-06-rtgdir-lc-dhody-2024-02-05/

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 10:31 PM Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li<mailto:tony.li@tony.li>> wrote:

[WG chair hat: on]


Hi all,

It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.

This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with:

        “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”

or

        “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”

This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.

Thanks,
Tony

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org<mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email