Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB4BC14F6B8 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.195
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.195 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-omAY7NbVbZ for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8274C14F5EF for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 20:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.31]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4V8W0S5Vd5z6J9D7 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:47:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.160.224]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC841404F9 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:48:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) by lhrpeml100006.china.huawei.com (7.191.160.224) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:48:38 +0100
Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.229) by dggpemm500001.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.35; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:48:36 +0800
Received: from dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.229]) by dggpemm500002.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.229]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.035; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 11:48:36 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
Thread-Index: AQHahR98fp+9l/yBEUicMiUVeiPf9rFV6O3Q
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:48:35 +0000
Message-ID: <a91417002f934b1aa8eb410fc03f5c41@huawei.com>
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.110.46.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/cvA2sZkptjVDjooDzn9WTgqhcLs>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:48:45 -0000

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li
> Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 1:01 AM
> To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
> Subject: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to
> historic
> 
> 
> [WG chair hat: on]
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option
> for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.
> 
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all
> with:
> 
> 	“Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> or
> 
> 	“No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
> 
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls