IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 02 April 2024 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4936C14CF1A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:13:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id huEpb-fr2RDC for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:12:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50032C14F736 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 11:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (vs4.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.122]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 432ICp4o008641; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:12:51 +0100
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771E14604F; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:12:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs4.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8A14604C; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:12:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs4.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:12:51 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.235.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 432ICo0K010804 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:12:50 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Tony Li' <tony.li@tony.li>, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:12:48 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <001301da8529$5f825020$1e86f060$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQHUs+7rEb0WWa/jSSNGElLTaRaBprFg6j5Q
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.235.217
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=N5QcqK26EVnzu6X8eu7uG2TqYwnz59MkfBbLNWWyEkI=; b=Hjn gIcPd146bmnXqPoZoHzDzUC7YkoUiSXTrn93aNBYK4FVbNMBNrSnebkuYP0tqIQY jFyX8TU5yoKXYh4YEwJ76kxDdkKFpaVhdiTe4o43Wmj15F11uFOPWT227qEcV8gX p0JBrN4935kTewh0iqXS3SUZqTem0M0UDlbQdE6BvCIlKtaj173axce5yWo2bJhP sfTNcb+Ee2NbI4fx4Si8EuKRewB/fJM7+Y2d98F5Vo/1wTWeN0ALcCAHkibMqdi9 Nuyj8Ija06MyynTukrZEa3zwk98/0E6ZBwhJPulA9cdL9kC6e34wWhIWZPCgdce8 eXOzMyQOPLfyQTUodvw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28294.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.136-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.136-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28294.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.136300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: L8tZF6zWW2rxIbpQ8BhdbAvBTB90+he+TJDl9FKHbrmGD9O3ui1h2ESi 2ut9sl80rpyextBSI2t1cgRJLEBdHAW415pKepyxSHCU59h5KrFAFzNhpJiCTzABh2rVVNejxnU Xzyseixx2Drq+F6jWovEQJMzDJIETQqvLyTLhF8W8coKUcaOOvZRy1HDTPOXaulGrXrvXpSePd1 lLIAtF4u9FZUbZUmFAWqLBUk/Na0sJcF0dzzdhWWMTeMAuDqlgfS0Ip2eEHnxlgn288nW9IGsT/ XFoz7PuF8hs8W5tMc/dB/CxWTRRu25FeHtsUoHuobUZRsskfV68TcnpluaKobku+nrcA68ch1rH 8lYyNb/FhXMjdQIJpg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/N-8MwmozXbd365G2BM4som6UpkE>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 18:13:00 -0000

If they give you lines...

I think it is a fine idea to move RFC 7506 to Historic status in keeping with what we have learned over the years and in consideration of the lspping-norao draft.

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: 02 April 2024 18:01
To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic


[WG chair hat: on]


Hi all,

It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.

This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with: 

	“Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”

or

	“No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”

This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.

Thanks,
Tony

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email