IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Wed, 03 April 2024 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D36C14F61E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:38:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.745
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.745 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZlS4-_XwNwsP for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAC0BC14F5FC for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6e6fb9a494aso4824226b3a.0 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712111919; x=1712716719; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BNanCcCOvertml4bSL4xWdPj8uuNAk2PH2vLJRjAn5I=; b=CBmBr1pkf+hM8VfzBkBfJRFJKtROzBh+DMuaEkRdZSISeh+yvSPxDB8q7SWTU0Cd05 CUfNi1uE6nxdHQmSfUumdJMXZDJ5Udggq4mNg01up2dpdl8A43C/4xnPj+tu0hMPx5b0 zXXbvblaPwxZT6mTzIkDhLtANrdtsnuiWO5hLls0/7gUbq6m/FBWWCe/nI0rJJj9+Jz5 xRVOTHu8ga2EkA2+txSr+11hLIuZvguZApaXCw4b/HhPe3lD9EKf7oxwHZz8Wkt0cq9p VhuRxFpQDM22s9WLTD9LqqWBXCSjGzDXWBJ8MUqCPL9QGuUtfARR4ds3ZIrIPI1Rsa0s JK3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712111919; x=1712716719; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:sender:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BNanCcCOvertml4bSL4xWdPj8uuNAk2PH2vLJRjAn5I=; b=odIQDwP1fbsKqUIE73iMV+aBnfdIebLVe4uNhiCUOUngBRIjutJ44Jty6fUPB7T/GB wltyL2UMuBu1nhBr9ya4uLYB46504tjJM7ApvGPQORRxBg7OP/LYgL59GybzBcHxKBRT iS8Ho2cu8hMWUmWjfkpSJproCiJid1AatmmmHfxt6deMACG3w5VUiGOUc41+VRW8A2ZE al2z/nXZk5ff3+1oD9PbfAfYf9BFhJnC/GPRfeH/U2cvkdsaXlEkZlcXcZcprvsIwDC5 r4j834nvoandYNaLyK8HMuShm9MN1YWRNpr/3m17YHSGrrhHq3EXeB8SRy8X9fxV0XNa 6+gg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVQckflwuBS+8U+hFhgqQIbHeKYaFpoRt39PonENJ0dF46cfWOeKFCqTOo7c9n3NIEMDzwPuPhTCtvUabxY
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyJEqI0IQylyeJm68oCumsgMbwiKtEjgpnNuqg60kw4vZBb1kw6 6AZcZ233hyWE5Iz4dMRkrrjDCYqyRZJmqitcKP0kCZ1IwVy5giZ4
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHdiY4HMN/9/XPfBMGFrlRonVSbY/yMo2nFfIi8HmaR4aBSCXdTrWxIdifX0+8V00HoW2GIXw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2e97:b0:6e7:3939:505e with SMTP id fd23-20020a056a002e9700b006e73939505emr13841744pfb.2.1712111919152; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-93-167-4.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.93.167.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z185-20020a6265c2000000b006ea80883ce3sm10952217pfb.133.2024.04.02.19.38.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <F418D725-7198-4AEE-A71F-06704D0836D9@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:38:28 -0700
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7967533-7F8D-46CC-9126-ECFFFC32153D@tony.li>
References: <001301da8529$5f825020$1e86f060$@olddog.co.uk> <F418D725-7198-4AEE-A71F-06704D0836D9@gmail.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/YAB2cgWuAQxkmyBsNPsrmto5F20>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 02:38:40 -0000

[WG chair hat: on]

Hi Loa,

I’m sorry, but I don’t know how to interpret this response.

Tony


> On Apr 2, 2024, at 7:25 PM, Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I support making RFC 7506.
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 3 Apr 2024, at 02:13, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> If they give you lines...
>> 
>> I think it is a fine idea to move RFC 7506 to Historic status in keeping with what we have learned over the years and in consideration of the lspping-norao draft.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Adrian
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li
>> Sent: 02 April 2024 18:01
>> To: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
>> 
>> 
>> [WG chair hat: on]
>> 
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to Historic.
>> 
>> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please reply-all with:
>> 
>>   “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>> 
>> or
>> 
>>   “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>> 
>> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tony
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email