IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6D9C14F5FB for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kpCMhdCpab-r for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x1135.google.com (mail-yw1-x1135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757CFC14F680 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x1135.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-61461580403so37605977b3.2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:05:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712084701; x=1712689501; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=N2tTVkqZDmCpsqk20wqvj4qLNGrM7ZGT4LhfcjMvU5o=; b=OFxZsSTIMZJkc/aREkgSwc2Zbt+HBIWR9M7F87oZwaxC4XWHy8iWZZWrw6NTt3l/6K /Gdm5g+BUDVRNY3g0Gxv0JxkYADxli6dmFF3yz0feHAtgr1FFTCWu1INUNDc8vQoo/5v 1mC/cn5G+TMk4QMkuAVdd9IO8sJBcDfmB2qxfrPvxBf65s1sglWWZB3uRpzk4wcapZgY a24titIqSyNqG8QXi7m0T+U+WlAHt5m6qydw0hah6e6H9vaAEs3+U9meEYgvMbxSZEs1 Onry8G7mffCnjLByxf0/MOYaLRPa9PP9sXUWCJGDYncKCl8/swnPD4fEKHCq+Xuwtz5u iV7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712084701; x=1712689501; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=N2tTVkqZDmCpsqk20wqvj4qLNGrM7ZGT4LhfcjMvU5o=; b=sCQ/LsA2LgqnzewvuMz2JwE0UamuWpzeuFkQrjFfdnHM/iJRblsW7/kraHZyLJLYdQ vwU/+WbcalsW/PreJR3JrCXNRUyfOkP9UVdwNiJDaO4fQjb7L/dIlN2l22pS7lH+jVPh WSl3c+5dWeRZdbeYzyI8zsu4yQbICnnUDn54PQDTQQcfOu9rQs9nmpNKxxAzf0Rvrfdb cBEncMouThGc8BBEMcBTvy71BRinlxUTvNXKn8XuRXjWDeJ0BysYpGfQ79wMOYi4pQEp DBEWGlhSS3Nhm+9Qa7da077wq0brajieryBy8HnkDN8AhGUGRTbESjCPQnlVYqqmlXkG 9wgg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz091OLUmGRB1IysleT5mRwYOUlSx1jBFw3Mt6MGg18ZwS5U93l diTanybsLLR0EuqUlzq96w3sk4uQ5K5a5YmWF2rdwMgIDmhtaEQ89LzVIqer+29qd1hllDsSQPc PmFtZMvkgf5Pt80+XG2Ot544cy2IzjHHk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF91ZGe4uWS6cc+tWDMfrsvJIfrmhZWmEnIfrabWQer5fccr+DoM8lmpDeQ7G6NmV1LaXOzF4Nb7CYwFlLryJ0=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4854:0:b0:615:1d24:8431 with SMTP id v81-20020a814854000000b006151d248431mr3000446ywa.48.1712084701042; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <19F1FC07-F79B-44A6-A604-372729C42CA4@tony.li>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:04:49 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmVyau1vRUpQ05di6tWdWYZYG719Qtni1Mvj3bx8vVyxEQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006e614d061521c895"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/I-j3JSQP3CjRQ21JM2V9m987boo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] WG consensus check: RFC 7506 (IPv6 Router Alert Option) to historic
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:05:06 -0000

Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic.

Regards,
Greg

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 10:01 Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> [WG chair hat: on]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> It has been proposed that we transition RFC 7506, "IPv6 Router Alert
> Option for MPLS Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)” to
> Historic.
>
> This note starts a two-week consensus check on this change. Please
> reply-all with:
>
>         “Yes, I support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> or
>
>         “No, I do not support moving RFC 7506 to Historic”
>
> This poll will close at 12:01 PM PDT 16 Apr 2024.
>
> Thanks,
> Tony
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email