Re: [Ntp] Finding leap-seconds.list

Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> Fri, 09 November 2018 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sla@ucolick.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9D612D4EE for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sGhMf417Waai for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (zilan.ucolick.org [128.114.23.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72BB9128766 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB7C29AF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (geneva.ucolick.org [128.114.23.183]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BB029A6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geneva.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C65F616 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sla@localhost) by geneva.ucolick.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id wA9IB6Ch021404 for ntp@ietf.org; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 10:11:06 -0800
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 10:11:06 -0800
From: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>
To: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20181109181106.GA20185@ucolick.org>
References: <5884DA3A-B95B-4D6B-9A31-E964CE4F02EF@gmail.com> <53bc1310-c198-557a-54ca-57b5b0af9bcb@meinberg.de> <AM6PR0602MB3733A11C62B7A0ED49F318B5FFC40@AM6PR0602MB3733.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9A89609A-9A4E-41EB-A857-91252E5F6D04@gmail.com> <43c65279-12fa-4510-1d8f-b6e1b03caf7e@gmail.com> <a7d8d58b-7370-1b4c-0c70-fd775dfbf854@cs.ucla.edu> <5f8998a5-d550-95b8-fa46-5e1c1ca7b0e9@meinberg.de> <733a2063-f557-459e-b4e9-0db6c88ab430@ntp.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <733a2063-f557-459e-b4e9-0db6c88ab430@ntp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/cnkQzbckVW--Wdp6X0SKYC2e27I>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Finding leap-seconds.list
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 18:11:09 -0000

On Fri 2018-11-09T10:47:47-0500 Danny Mayer hath writ:
> My understanding is that IERS is the body responsible for deciding when
> to declare a leap-second.

> The distribution of the information seems to be a vague process.

The IETF inherited this responsibility in 1988 from the original
responsible agency, International Time Bureau (BIH).  The process has
never been specified other than a leap second must be announced at
least 8 weeks in advance.  This made sense at the date of the original
recommendation 460 in 1970 because at that time BIH was publishing
Bulletin Horaire every two months.  No regulation required BIH nor
requires IERS to publish this information in a machine-accessible
format, and no there is no source of funds for publishing with a
robust technology.

This timekeeping tragedy-of-the-commons can be seen at least as far
back as 1925 when broadcast time signals were being used by navigators
of vessels, commercial clock setting operations, surveyors, and
geodecists around the world.  The IAU was paying all of the expenses
of running the BIH and wondering if maybe they could get the IUGG to
contribute some funds toward the understanding of why different time
broadcasts disagreed and studying ways of improving their
synchronization

http://adsbit.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=1926BuBIH...2..123S&db_key=AST&page_ind=20&data_type=GIF&type=SCREEN_VIEW&classic=YES

--
Steve Allen                    <sla@ucolick.org>              WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260  Natural Sciences II, Room 165  Lat  +36.99855
1156 High Street               Voice: +1 831 459 3046         Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064           http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/   Hgt +250 m