IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Finding leap-seconds.list

Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org> Thu, 08 November 2018 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <sla@ucolick.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FAD130E1A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8McbKzYkPNnT for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (zilan.ucolick.org [128.114.23.234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25D93130DEF for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9CD29AF; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (geneva.ucolick.org [128.114.23.183]) by smtp.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D1F29A6; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from geneva.ucolick.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by geneva.ucolick.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CB0735; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sla@localhost) by geneva.ucolick.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id wA86wsIH009201; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:58:54 -0800
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:58:54 -0800
From: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>
To: "tglassey@earthlink.net" <tglassey@earthlink.net>
Cc: Steve Allen <sla@ucolick.org>, ntp@ietf.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, hidinginthebbc@gmail.com, Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de>, denis.reilly@orolia.com, dsibold.ietf@gmail.com, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20181108065854.GA9022@ucolick.org>
References: <E1gKe2T-0007Ql-Nd@elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1gKe2T-0007Ql-Nd@elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/fT35Y1dm4jFHVQyYgAmkHp1k5cw>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Finding leap-seconds.list
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 06:58:58 -0000

On Thu 2018-11-08T09:43:33+0300 tglassey@earthlink.net hath writ:
> Again this is something the gov.  is responsible for IMHO and it
> should be a formal project of NIST ITS or the Calibration Services
> desk.

Good luck with that.  I expect no more compliance than when the
director of time at USNO who was co-responsible for suggesting that
the leap second was the solution to the problem then decided that he
would ignore CCIR Rec 460 and continue the USNO broadcast time signals
without leap seconds.

https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/leapincept.html

--
Steve Allen                    <sla@ucolick.org>              WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB 260  Natural Sciences II, Room 165  Lat  +36.99855
1156 High Street               Voice: +1 831 459 3046         Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064           http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/   Hgt +250 m

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email