Re: Online Certificate Revocation Protocol

Hansen Wang <hansen.wang@home.com> Sat, 09 June 2001 01:36 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA23749 for <pkix-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 21:36:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA12143 for ietf-pkix-bks; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.rdc2.bc.home.com (mail1.rdc2.bc.home.com [24.2.10.84]) by above.proper.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA12117; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from home.com ([24.76.94.62]) by mail1.rdc2.bc.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010609010219.BLUV5976.mail1.rdc2.bc.home.com@home.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:02:19 -0700
Message-ID: <3B217486.F993AA77@home.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 17:57:42 -0700
From: Hansen Wang <hansen.wang@home.com>
Reply-To: hansenw@ece.ubc.ca
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Bartoletti <azb@llnl.gov>
CC: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@imc.org>, ietf-pkix@imc.org
Subject: Re: Online Certificate Revocation Protocol
References: < <5.0.1.4.2.20010608164340.02079118@exna07.securitydynamics.com> <5.0.1.4.2.20010608164340.02079118@exna07.securitydynamics.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010608155719.00b0b5c0@poptop.llnl.gov>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-pkix@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-pkix-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-pkix.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Tony Bartoletti wrote:

> If CAs may "take a long time" to effect the out-of-band revocation, I have
> to assume the issue is really some combination of "staffing" and "low
> priority", rather than a concern about DoS.

But out-of-band could also mean going to the CA's web page and filling
out a form such as typing in the some passwords/passphrase, presenting
some electronic credentials or mother's maiden name (bad example) to
request for the revocation. This would not involve staffing and would be
nearly as quick as sending the revocation message through "in-band"
means.

Hansen