Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG

Ignacio Goyret <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 12 September 2011 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A41B21F8B88 for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:18:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRFOR7BZueEZ for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:18:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B30A21F8B73 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id p8CEJqQq024975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:20:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cliff.eng.ascend.com (cliff.eng.ascend.com [192.207.23.55]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id p8CEJon0030988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:19:52 -0500
Received: from igoyret-c1.alcatel-lucent.com (igoyret.lra.lucent.com [135.244.24.195]) by cliff.eng.ascend.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p8CEJinp008861 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:19:48 -0700
Message-Id: <201109121419.p8CEJinp008861@cliff.eng.ascend.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 07:17:00 -0700
To: Vernon Schryver <vjs@rhyolite.com>
From: Ignacio Goyret <i.goyret@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <201109111422.p8BEMtnS006793@calcite.rhyolite.com>
References: <4E6C5F8C.6020605@gmail.com> <201109111422.p8BEMtnS006793@calcite.rhyolite.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: pppext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 14:18:51 -0000

At 02:22 PM 9/11/2011 +0000, Vernon Schryver wrote:
>> From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
>
>> > http://www.freesound.org/people/Jlew/sounds/16475/
>>
>> Well, this is all good fun, in a US/Euro-centric kind of way, but it
>> would be good to remember that in a very large part of the world our
>> "theme song" is a still a vital part of the Internet & is likely to
>> remain so for a considerable period of time.  This email will make the
>> first hop of its journey over (the much maligned) PPPoE, for example;
>> not everybody lives in advanced countries such as S. Korea (the
>> connectivity of which should make both the French and Americans hang
>> their heads in shame).  In short, PPP is far from obsolete.
>
>I don't think the thrust of that claim is entirely accurate.  Do people
>outside advanced countries use dialup modems or wireless?


Actually, a *lot* of people still use dialup modems and in most cases,
they don't even notice. One simple example: many point-of-sale devices
(pretty much everywhere on the planet, including the US) do a quick
V.21/V.22/V.23 dialup call to authorize a credit or debit card charge.

And guess what: pretty much all of them use good, ol' PPP.

Another device which is not as well spread in the US but is available
in many, many countries is a little USB device that links up to 3G
networks, allowing full IP traffic. Guess what: they also use PPP and
the same dialup framework (even if there are no weeee-weeee, hiss-hiss
sounds).

BTW, as a simple reference, I happen to be right now in a country
that would clearly fall in the "outside advanced countries" and,
paraphrasing Glen, this email will start its trip using PPP over 3G.

Cheers to all,
-Ignacio