Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 04:17 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pppext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B65F21F853E for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:17:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.524
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Riq7xShtcJXB for <pppext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com (mail-yi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6DF21F858C for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:17:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yic13 with SMTP id 13so7127606yic.31 for <pppext@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Aow8RdWgD4Pq7cGDI7xfonw9JtPwbrIxpx1faQwVFJ0=; b=AibZ3D+yn0hQUQ7QLfpSGx970Z4fjJnQaCKYCqOpE9oKDlH2hhHOhKF9jRCsgcxWsH ZY6nkvJjZsrhIe+0HgFxfOdE1haxOlLlKY0xcu2Hi7vT+cQG9MVDtcWeeMmt8EDB8TPo 65/rkQUsc/tJ+zIVmHG4ncML6ReCIjLxe0Vk0=
Received: by 10.150.160.7 with SMTP id i7mr6178328ybe.373.1317183616298; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:20:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.98] (ppp-110-169-254-11.revip5.asianet.co.th. [110.169.254.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s20sm24160995ank.11.2011.09.27.21.20.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:20:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E82A074.4030406@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:20:04 +0700
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
References: <CAF4+nEF-G1zpRABffyT+fpx=Oc0__u1Yth6oK-1UWLTqEgCRVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEFNPkZsnkDw_T0ehjTAdHTK4OMJ6kf8H39xYGRHSxaPkA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEFNPkZsnkDw_T0ehjTAdHTK4OMJ6kf8H39xYGRHSxaPkA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF PPP Extensions <pppext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Pppext] Future of the PPP WG
X-BeenThere: pppext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PPP Extensions <pppext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pppext>
List-Post: <mailto:pppext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext>, <mailto:pppext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 04:17:30 -0000

On 9/28/2011 2:31 AM, Donald Eastlake wrote:
> There will not be a PPPEXT meeting in Taiwan.
> 
> Probably next week, I'll review this thread and post my conclusions.

Actually, there is one useful thing that this WG could do before its
demise: update or obsolete RFC 3818 so that necessary work can be done
when it (the WG) is gone.

...