Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

Hi,

I support the draft.  It and its RSVP-TE and LSP Ping equivalents are designed to facilitate one-sided NMS provisioning.  This is entirely consistent with GMPLS and MPLS which both strive to reduce coordinated configuration.

Thanks,

John

Sent from my iPhone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Nadeau
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: Andrew G. Malis
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-
> config-06
> 
> 
> 	As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a bad idea
> to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want
> this adopted as a WG draft.
> 
> 	--Tom
> 
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> 
> > This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group adoption
> > of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20.
> >
> > You can read the draft at
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 .
> >
> > The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information.
> >
> > Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andy
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3