Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:04 PM, John E Drake wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I support the draft.  It and its RSVP-TE and LSP Ping equivalents are designed to facilitate one-sided NMS provisioning.  This is entirely consistent with GMPLS and MPLS which both strive to reduce coordinated configuration.

	While doing what you say, the same problems that I pointed out on this thread exist in those approaches as well. I have raised the same issues in CCAMP and MPLS. Two wrongs don't make a right. *)

	--Tom

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Thomas Nadeau
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:17 AM
>> To: Andrew G. Malis
>> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-
>> config-06
>> 
>> 
>> 	As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a bad idea
>> to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want
>> this adopted as a WG draft.
>> 
>> 	--Tom
>> 
>> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>> 
>>> This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group adoption
>>> of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20.
>>> 
>>> You can read the draft at
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 .
>>> 
>>> The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information.
>>> 
>>> Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pwe3 mailing list
>>> pwe3@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> 