Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Fri, 09 September 2011 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1398821F8AA9 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lOw2jpUcTl1p for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og105.obsmtp.com (exprod7og105.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.163]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5332821F8A7E for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob105.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTmoIQf1O6yfyZryzhzejTjONtETzT9nS@postini.com; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:36:53 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:33:45 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 05:33:47 -0700
Thread-Topic: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
Thread-Index: Acxu7Ld7mJbVgu69RMK9wYH9RpiU/Q==
Message-ID: <43ECE384-74C8-4DB0-A413-8752178A17D0@juniper.net>
References: <CAA=duU0VkZ1AyHyZ2GX5vbrP2cjy_VPxugawyeoptrQakF59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <3E1E08EE-45F0-4539-9FFD-99F5FDDBCB76@lucidvision.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A168812BD5@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <3FA8E967-231D-404A-A3C1-D94235CE355D@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <3FA8E967-231D-404A-A3C1-D94235CE355D@lucidvision.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:34:59 -0000

Tom,

I think we are agreeing to disagree.  I think this and the other IDs  
are a positive step forward.

John

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 9, 2011, at 8:07 PM, "Thomas Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>  
wrote:

>
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:04 PM, John E Drake wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I support the draft.  It and its RSVP-TE and LSP Ping equivalents  
>> are designed to facilitate one-sided NMS provisioning.  This is  
>> entirely consistent with GMPLS and MPLS which both strive to reduce  
>> coordinated configuration.
>
>    While doing what you say, the same problems that I pointed out on  
> this thread exist in those approaches as well. I have raised the  
> same issues in CCAMP and MPLS. Two wrongs don't make a right. *)
>
>    --Tom
>
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> John
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On  
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Thomas Nadeau
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:17 AM
>>> To: Andrew G. Malis
>>> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-
>>> config-06
>>>
>>>
>>>    As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a bad idea
>>> to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want
>>> this adopted as a WG draft.
>>>
>>>    --Tom
>>>
>>> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>>>
>>>> This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group  
>>>> adoption
>>>> of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20.
>>>>
>>>> You can read the draft at
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 .
>>>>
>>>> The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information.
>>>>
>>>> Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Andy
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pwe3 mailing list
>>>> pwe3@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> pwe3 mailing list
>>> pwe3@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>
>