IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com> Tue, 13 September 2011 15:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lmartini@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1915121F8B15 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BSfv81m6d-Cd for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from napoleon.monoski.com (napoleon.monoski.com [70.90.113.113]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76D721F8B18 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from confusion.monoski.com (confusion.monoski.com [209.245.27.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by napoleon.monoski.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8DF29AX001620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:02:10 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E6F7071.1090102@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:02:09 -0600
From: Luca Martini <lmartini@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
References: <CAA=duU0VkZ1AyHyZ2GX5vbrP2cjy_VPxugawyeoptrQakF59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <3E1E08EE-45F0-4539-9FFD-99F5FDDBCB76@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E1E08EE-45F0-4539-9FFD-99F5FDDBCB76@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:00:11 -0000

I also agree that this is a bad idea.
If we need a network management protocol , this is not the place for it.
So i do not support this document.

Luca


On 09/06/11 10:17, Thomas Nadeau wrote:
> 	As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a bad idea to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want this adopted as a WG draft.
>
> 	--Tom
>
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
>
>> This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group adoption
>> of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20.
>>
>> You can read the draft at
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 .
>>
>> The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information.
>>
>> Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andy
>> _______________________________________________
>> pwe3 mailing list
>> pwe3@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email