IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> Tue, 20 September 2011 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0B121F8C9F for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.291
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.291 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.307, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1i9CARhIMVrZ for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2B921F8C99 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 08:07:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-a3-4e78acba81aa
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0A.D7.20773.ABCA87E4; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:09:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.84]) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se ([10.2.3.125]) with mapi; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:09:46 +0200
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
To: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 17:09:45 +0200
Thread-Topic: PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
Thread-Index: Acx3goEzNOnfu6S8SwuR/ru8rkcptwAIe1TwAAC3CwA=
Message-ID: <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA141A77A75D@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <666A6B6D38439F49A7FB8E0FE839CA06016D957C5F@ESESSCMS0365.eemea.ericsson.se> <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF12EDF66D0FB@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <FE60A4E52763E84B935532D7D9294FF12EDF66D0FB@EUSAACMS0715.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: it-IT, en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA141A77A75DESESSCMS0360e_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:07:22 -0000

yes/support

BR
Daniele

________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gregory Mirsky
Sent: martedì 20 settembre 2011 16.50
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

yes/support

    Regards,
        Greg

________________________________
From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Elisa Bellagamba
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 3:46 AM
To: pwe3@ietf.org
Subject: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

Hello,

I support the WG adoption for draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06.

I think it would be useful having the OAM configuration taken care automatically by the control plane. Regarding some comments raising the fact that this was traditionally done by the NMS, this doesn't prevent to keep doing that in the traditional way. Moreover, the described configuration method is backward compatible.

We addressed the same problematic within CCAMP where we extended RSVP-TE for MPLS-TP OAM configuration but still keeping the possibility to do that via NMS. We even extended lsp-ping for such kind of configuration. All the 3 methods are simply working following a trivial precedence rule which prevents the risk of any overlapping between the 3.

Cheers,
Elisa

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email