IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06

Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn Fri, 09 September 2011 01:14 UTC

Return-Path: <malcolm.betts@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325D621F8ABB for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mhp6FS9nBZRw for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CACA21F8BEE for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.99] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 131321397396305; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:00:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.21] by [192.168.168.15] with StormMail ESMTP id 74991.1397396305; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:16:40 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id p891GaXr063668 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:16:36 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A168812BD5@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <CAA=duU0VkZ1AyHyZ2GX5vbrP2cjy_VPxugawyeoptrQakF59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <3E1E08EE-45F0-4539-9FFD-99F5FDDBCB76@lucidvision.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A168812BD5@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
To: pwe3@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 9CDCE79E:722A9B16-85257906:0006AA51; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009
Message-ID: <OF9CDCE79E.722A9B16-ON85257906.0006AA51-85257906.0006FBE1@zte.com.cn>
From: Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 21:16:10 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2011-09-09 09:16:37, Serialize complete at 2011-09-09 09:16:37
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0006FBE085257906_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn p891GaXr063668
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 01:14:58 -0000

Hi,

I support this draft since it allows the OAM to be configured at the same 
time that a connection is signalled/established.

Regards,

Malcolm




John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> 
Sent by: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org
08/09/2011 09:04 PM

To
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" 
<agmalis@gmail.com>
cc
"pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject
Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06






Hi,

I support the draft.  It and its RSVP-TE and LSP Ping equivalents are 
designed to facilitate one-sided NMS provisioning.  This is entirely 
consistent with GMPLS and MPLS which both strive to reduce coordinated 
configuration.

Thanks,

John

Sent from my iPhone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Thomas Nadeau
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:17 AM
> To: Andrew G. Malis
> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-
> config-06
> 
> 
>                As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a 
bad idea
> to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want
> this adopted as a WG draft.
> 
>                --Tom
> 
> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> 
> > This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group adoption
> > of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20.
> >
> > You can read the draft at
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 .
> >
> > The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information.
> >
> > Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andy
> > _______________________________________________
> > pwe3 mailing list
> > pwe3@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> pwe3@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email