Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Fri, 09 September 2011 13:29 UTC
Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F5321F87D6 for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.155
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.551, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hkNff9IRb2hl for <pwe3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A82C21F8680 for <pwe3@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.68.174] (unknown [141.202.11.155]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60751DFB6F6; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:31:09 -0400 (EDT)
References: <CAA=duU0VkZ1AyHyZ2GX5vbrP2cjy_VPxugawyeoptrQakF59QQ@mail.gmail.com> <3E1E08EE-45F0-4539-9FFD-99F5FDDBCB76@lucidvision.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A168812BD5@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <3FA8E967-231D-404A-A3C1-D94235CE355D@lucidvision.com> <43ECE384-74C8-4DB0-A413-8752178A17D0@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <43ECE384-74C8-4DB0-A413-8752178A17D0@juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 8L1)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <9A8500A9-2530-4222-A013-9A71E052ADB9@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (8L1)
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:31:55 -0400
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
Cc: "pwe3@ietf.org" <pwe3@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06
X-BeenThere: pwe3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Pseudo Wires Edge to Edge <pwe3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pwe3>
List-Post: <mailto:pwe3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3>, <mailto:pwe3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:29:17 -0000
On Sep 9, 2011, at 8:33 AM, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> wrote: > Tom, > > I think we are agreeing to disagree. Yes. > I think this and the other IDs > are a positive step forward. Coming from a management background and working at a big operator, I can safely say this is a really bad idea - whether or not it's in a requirement s draft or not. What ultimately will happen is this functionality will just be disabled and not used anyways. Tom > > John > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 9, 2011, at 8:07 PM, "Thomas Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Sep 8, 2011, at 9:04 PM, John E Drake wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I support the draft. It and its RSVP-TE and LSP Ping equivalents >>> are designed to facilitate one-sided NMS provisioning. This is >>> entirely consistent with GMPLS and MPLS which both strive to reduce >>> coordinated configuration. >> >> While doing what you say, the same problems that I pointed out on >> this thread exist in those approaches as well. I have raised the >> same issues in CCAMP and MPLS. Two wrongs don't make a right. *) >> >> --Tom >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> John >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: pwe3-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pwe3-bounces@ietf.org] On >>>> Behalf Of >>>> Thomas Nadeau >>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:17 AM >>>> To: Andrew G. Malis >>>> Cc: pwe3@ietf.org >>>> Subject: Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam- >>>> config-06 >>>> >>>> >>>> As I mentioned during the meeting, I think this it is a bad idea >>>> to allow configuration via the OAM control channel, so I do not want >>>> this adopted as a WG draft. >>>> >>>> --Tom >>>> >>>> On Sep 6, 2011, at 10:58 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: >>>> >>>>> This email begins a two-week poll on the PWE3 working group >>>>> adoption >>>>> of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06, to end on Sept. 20. >>>>> >>>>> You can read the draft at >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-config-06 . >>>>> >>>>> The MPLS working group was bcc:ed for their information. >>>>> >>>>> Please respond with any comments to pwe3@ietf.org ONLY. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Andy >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> pwe3 mailing list >>>>> pwe3@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> pwe3 mailing list >>>> pwe3@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3 >>> >> >
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… zhang.fei3
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… zhang.fei3
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Giles Heron
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… zhang.fei3
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… zhang.fei3
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… neil.2.harrison
- [PWE3] 答复: [mpls] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang… yang.jian90
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Malcolm.BETTS
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Lizhong Jin
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Luca Martini
- Re: [PWE3] [mpls] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang… xiao.min2
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… fu.xihua
- [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw… Elisa Bellagamba
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… David Sinicrope
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… John E Drake
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… David Allan I
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Satoru Matsushima
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… zhang.fei3
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Yaakov Stein
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… David Allan I
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… neil.2.harrison
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… David Allan I
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Andrew G. Malis
- [PWE3] Discussion on draft-zhang-mpls-tp-pw-oam-c… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [PWE3] PWE3 WG adoption of draft-zhang-mpls-t… Andrew G. Malis