IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 18 December 2020 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9803A0B54; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pg5Ev9lsgSJ9; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84303A0B46; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB684F40749; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A22F40749 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uXbgG8aRXwE4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x434.google.com (mail-pf1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::434]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC53FF4073E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x434.google.com with SMTP id c12so556843pfo.10 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O2Z9jqgh4om3uCQx3bnDaf/W4F9TPLYQe67BSouu3B4=; b=K7fFZOztD6N7WaBYn3ZyAEdwMiVLS1Nr78HElAPY9Q/uDr+BrCY8PtlmBy9KrEClAk WWikPpHAgWFTpRbJuhm/OnJz6Sg4FTOhwrTFGg1BIt4lMLxXHdeJgY0YVZuWFqDPySvR e3QXGkgYPFAkFOkr2q6Q5iNAS29rL99iHcWgnPOku2/LQgMT9cZP37wUIx+ZccqeCvrO IFcGiYQK4yVW2or0TppZBOE1RDsSnIiLnMdobkyMHs2Jqh7ukLXTPeZkKilpnSg8jvIn 0tDZZzbF2OlGtNraffzFMCmN9wgjXhF/ywiTAyfhWP0BAp5gmPxx2jbdxcGQjUx/9MsA XvdA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O2Z9jqgh4om3uCQx3bnDaf/W4F9TPLYQe67BSouu3B4=; b=QLBsgrAAgMBwM7xf+LwccbYQ8CAbdbriB5InaLOYvbiXKlDFjSXN+zv+mirCUYsqqx pitBigSDoRGpQ76wF49WA+PRHSXpQ/UE0v/N8A/LsN7xBqNwXF+7q0itLnnVgtFXEB/H DQgu6pltzG4Ta17/jn7JEHbnRFtJYHRSzGEOdh7eAbHIXPjKaL/oEN0OW/BR8sSa131Z lvh5re+0AJNtKeKnYZKIzLdDIbGXTFpqao18RiLQf+27MhlJiw7ATEgVCH6c3adfuSpz y+p0gwLJ4sXt4efgkkgMKNOHSCOnbWHXq2hZMWPkgkWRrQnvLYy4Upl/6j8UwEogU6NA qJDA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322cxHa5tRwWfnj0vL5Mo+ts43azNYyKY/mmrRIecSBj5QEgDOZ VGmso2gqS7cKxw2c57VAar1s9olowtkRXg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbe9HbewGwj0av0ygqleTUAc9m6lZJl9GN7syxASBTW6S2m2ABu4JWPHxTr4USzAVr7m1eTQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:1615:0:b029:19d:c9f1:f450 with SMTP id 21-20020a6216150000b029019dc9f1f450mr1675211pfw.11.1608256615972; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([151.210.131.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b1sm5922308pjh.54.2020.12.17.17.56.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Dec 2020 17:56:55 -0800 (PST)
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
References: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy> <AF7F0885-2D39-4F8D-A43B-E1D015146EAE@eggert.org> <72467617-6ca7-b2af-b826-d264c6b6380e@gmail.com> <D8AC8FA8-74DC-4B93-AB5B-73FBE1880F26@ietf.org> <4ef03ad3-1072-20e9-9676-2822a743a614@gmx.de> <afc0024a-e68b-0db8-90ef-1632875d2245@gmail.com> <10411562-B919-46E2-8BB2-A3D8AAD37FCC@tzi.org> <CABcZeBMeqa7R2Yd+sNHkTe1TUTBuxjXeWQ05vhEUEML_vUkwug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f50c9b15-3625-6e56-1d51-3bc2d1bc923c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 14:56:50 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMeqa7R2Yd+sNHkTe1TUTBuxjXeWQ05vhEUEML_vUkwug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 18-Dec-20 13:29, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 3:57 PM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org <mailto:cabo@tzi.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Emojis in RFCs don’t have to be ruled out by some mechanism (just as writing RFCs that are entirely about farting doesn't have to be); having a bit of (much more flexible) policy about this is fine (although we somehow never needed that for the second example).
> 
> 
> FWIW, while I don't generally think we ought to have our documents written in emojis, I do see some potentially valid reasons for them to appear, for instance if one was writing a document about the use of emojis.

Correct. Or we might want to use Cyrillic in a document about deçeptive DNS domain names. But then, regardless of what we want to prohibit via the style guide, we'd need to be explicit that .txt files are UTF-8. I could be mistaken, but I don't think we've said that in any current RFC.

     Brian



_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email