Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 18 December 2020 17:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAC73A0ADA; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHzgHTKaOOrJ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CFE3A0AD3; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166C9F40750; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24919F40750 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alum.mit.edu
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQfiLG0fmxnm for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10on2075.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.92.75]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D985F4074D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:13:31 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aEZfeUYFuGfMQOflKf4q8WNd9hWb/79/PUjoC9v3c5QGc+Sif6bGoTs/X6zDRx5KpggWKV/VJMYwK5JGQDQ1NMmJ06NF7Y+UvHtBq7P63ekabmsPJtPNV7QYqLMP8yF9RKVxq5cm1+dgp++dlV7Mlz8QW/XZkkZAA3AxgS89/u6jgsZd1zdD4nEHTbN6FnmN3MXI4jYG8anpxDN3tq+ENFNS7lcEGgC4oGaxWPuaR3IsBwEnfgayWQzboluytdx9sZSRDC1CrTS7RHA+NbBuaqkLlrfoUFYSx5yI9uxQN3trcRFOZD+g9PDgCSPQ/Zmg1ATXaIrkQyD6SFKpbKrWxA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+LwXvQYq3aZa1JMM0OZNzw0VieEdE0bI8/i+LK7k1N4=; b=Zq7VXcMD2noo/xXVbQcRyfijKmu6L+61D3w6ow9/Z5F/CzxMa6+aHub2yEQ6Cz19zDGPb15/PSIAbVmLM7scTBwBjp36JCy6BiWEDPY4tzUCGEa7shISE2TY43g+oIy2XcIzmNlSnaOrt9lkVAiiUAnNGOM4OeJ0tgAbixxDdOA14JOz/DPcSIJsVw0JbgAvVtWj7WEytTU4bJxwrb+SRYbhNSO1c4ta1rXPJX9VxBeBSjZNvewZBBAJe6iaDVoDoZMnsIZxGjNXQBTgufdtIKy01iQW5q0/u+lMH6a0VtjXjyktq45vugqpfxBZQesQuYARRuqFc6qmCTqGRgZbPw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 18.7.68.33) smtp.rcpttodomain=rfc-editor.org smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alum.mit.edu; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=+LwXvQYq3aZa1JMM0OZNzw0VieEdE0bI8/i+LK7k1N4=; b=Z9vtI3Uqy/Z7peCVdttjvPQWY4qAExI3UM+IyqH+nudGJ5G9xnNzFcN6RrHWCgfAU4QNpXzrLczwdGvQf1lzzA6v5vjDJzPjgho6cxq2dY9HZMzacNy5EFqFvBdqDsdvUYWsWjpTVUQzwucI3Lj9aEeVyiKmsArUr/JVt/cf/3c=
Received: from DM5PR18CA0088.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:3::26) by BL0PR12MB4658.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:207:32::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.13; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:13:36 +0000
Received: from CY1NAM02FT019.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:3:cafe::a8) by DM5PR18CA0088.outlook.office365.com (2603:10b6:3:3::26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3654.12 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:13:36 +0000
X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 18.7.68.33) smtp.mailfrom=alum.mit.edu; rfc-editor.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;rfc-editor.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=alum.mit.edu;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of alum.mit.edu designates 18.7.68.33 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=18.7.68.33; helo=outgoing-alum.mit.edu;
Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (18.7.68.33) by CY1NAM02FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.177) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3676.25 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 17:13:35 +0000
Received: from MacBook-Air.localdomain (c-24-62-227-142.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.62.227.142]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as pkyzivat@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 0BIHDWve006742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:13:33 -0500
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy> <AF7F0885-2D39-4F8D-A43B-E1D015146EAE@eggert.org> <72467617-6ca7-b2af-b826-d264c6b6380e@gmail.com> <D8AC8FA8-74DC-4B93-AB5B-73FBE1880F26@ietf.org> <4ef03ad3-1072-20e9-9676-2822a743a614@gmx.de> <afc0024a-e68b-0db8-90ef-1632875d2245@gmail.com> <10411562-B919-46E2-8BB2-A3D8AAD37FCC@tzi.org> <CABcZeBMeqa7R2Yd+sNHkTe1TUTBuxjXeWQ05vhEUEML_vUkwug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <aa501ccc-b84e-c149-4610-ec2e4d34cd01@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 12:13:32 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBMeqa7R2Yd+sNHkTe1TUTBuxjXeWQ05vhEUEML_vUkwug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 35ddb566-f896-4909-3ed1-08d8a3784121
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: BL0PR12MB4658:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <BL0PR12MB465884CCA7037EE38ACBD882F9C30@BL0PR12MB4658.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:7691;
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: M+C6P4bRkbXJucWY0saR1/D3wcWqOE2YtdZEx04rNFMWihKn/lBa7jooE+w9/vbxgKM7ayhziakr/47uUaaFaV1R0yCHpSJ00hE0eFZ2Jo18bZL8KdrXihcvE/a47fv5qFftDKH+Z34/056eUAHIWTw4vmou7nNUgWcicLcU91sJVJcK9TtgkuJED1FIl7H0QBl1b31TWzETMV1uSKgv/+F9TFTJxiZcQyUPTVE+fzdSTZA+oEkJh10DYLnLZANQ93l1vCWMGZiwob//WcqZ2Ae3sz5rCuwCxFX1BW48pdXUoSlWCzIHIOScQG2brduti8rs3IF543hRqGBOlLXrrahjOt3FO8S3OPHuUBF28zqLTaTKPKwn46/3z2QhM5LGI9UBGo9S3y3eE6GwVgiUBZMcgDwFRMlrPrMgoTEBR0ktD4Yhf5oP/Cx9QWWhpCrn
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:18.7.68.33; CTRY:US; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:CAL; SFV:NSPM; H:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; PTR:outgoing-alum.mit.edu; CAT:NONE; SFS:(346002)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(46966005)(356005)(86362001)(31696002)(31686004)(53546011)(5660300002)(6916009)(186003)(26005)(70586007)(4744005)(8676002)(956004)(8936002)(36906005)(478600001)(316002)(82740400003)(2906002)(786003)(2616005)(75432002)(47076004)(82310400003)(70206006)(7596003)(83380400001)(336012)(43740500002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
X-OriginatorOrg: alum.mit.edu
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Dec 2020 17:13:35.3177 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 35ddb566-f896-4909-3ed1-08d8a3784121
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=3326b102-c043-408b-a990-b89e477d582f; Ip=[18.7.68.33]; Helo=[outgoing-alum.mit.edu]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY1NAM02FT019.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR12MB4658
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On 12/17/20 7:29 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote: > FWIW, while I don't generally think we ought to have our documents > written in emojis, I do see some potentially valid reasons for them to > appear, for instance if one was writing a document about the use of emojis. Agree. Similarly, I don't think we should totally ban graphics that contain color or greyscale. There are good reasons to restrict that sort of usage to make documents accessible to more people. But surely there are exceptions. For instance a document that is explicitly concerned with color and greyscale. Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 tom petch
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 tom petch
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann