IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 02 December 2020 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2F3A13AF; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:56:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EKuSPJbKVzO4; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5349B3A1193; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E990AF4075B; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:55:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8174F4075B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:55:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khlBC_6FFZo7 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 761FAF40761 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 04:55:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dca87.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.202.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CmJqb0rxTzyVg; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:55:55 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <3199a9ee-e568-fa59-e8cd-4bb861a57daf@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 13:55:54 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 628606554.437158-581f0653a11edc59c079ff73743e9d11
Message-Id: <2CB2234E-0F90-4C2A-8084-7E89656AA9C9@tzi.org>
References: <F2E370D6-BCA9-4902-836E-8C5BADFE5209@eggert.org> <4cff4b9c-6464-659d-8b27-32396b59182c@levkowetz.com> <EC333D0C-D024-416B-9CAA-880D3E90368F@eggert.org> <115988ED-68A9-4E99-BB2E-55E0B5B0E96A@tzi.org> <44D623BB-9F0C-41F9-92E3-A39B0FAB8164@eggert.org> <C1E69941-33B2-41D4-84A1-3B621F67E292@tzi.org> <5129aae3-d14b-23ee-43b0-ad7a0cf44bee@gmx.de> <F6BBDA54-9906-45BB-83B1-B8866B94F109@tzi.org> <3199a9ee-e568-fa59-e8cd-4bb861a57daf@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

> I will stick with my opinion that <contact> should be reverted to its
> original definition (block content, for formatting similar as authors),
> and that we should just allow non-ASCII in prose (with the production
> center having an eye an abuse).

Completely agree.

Until that change happens, we have the workaround, which is marred by the incomplete integration of <contact/> into the grammar.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email