Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 17 December 2020 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A10D3A1507; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5kq0eUeV88y; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FFC73A1504; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E304F4071B; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CCFF4071B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:58:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IdqbiUha-Kfo for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BA6F40719 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:57:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2da6:576f:1ed7:8f56] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2da6:576f:1ed7:8f56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5B5360D5E7; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 08:57:48 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1608188268; bh=S+L74GV6nAx1cYqOagjXncYYVUDNFTLYLnaSBCpujgI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=ZaUqiz4uMWc/RummAmv76KOPK9SaRqlpB2gPXJ28ffzclqqJxZzUgypueRr+o7KXv D2HVHuAgp86M6RZKm/MORvMrkA/70WCU0Uve+DVQ7NsLlF8bkam202wi6XER5rD73W kLVEsWBB9OnUfmLEa27gRmhsGUHAfnzI5IKYJ3BY=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <AF7F0885-2D39-4F8D-A43B-E1D015146EAE@eggert.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 08:57:45 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy>
X-MailScanner-ID: A5B5360D5E7.A4365
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0159086777107022250=="
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Hi,

On 2020-12-16, at 20:48, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> In article <BB864858-1E71-45CF-9411-2ECB003B5EC0@eggert.org> you write:
>> It's ridiculous that I can't just write α when I mean α.
> 
> I agree with you but I don't yet see how we get from here to there or exactly
> where there is.

I think it was Julian who proposed to lift the restriction on Unicode to only be allowed in <contact> and instead rely on the community (at the I-D stage) and the IESG/ISE/RPC for when I-Ds become RFCs to check for "abuse" of Unicode (which I struggle to see happening in practice.)

Lars
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest