Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 17 December 2020 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E32D3A1057; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=Oy8GHwh6; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=nyNXHQGe
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V1BuTnSgTTdI; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FE73A0E66; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7CCF4073B; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537A2F4073B for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=Oy8GHwh6; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=nyNXHQGe
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U2H7god_PBO4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73A2F4073A for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 09:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 31593 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2020 17:01:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7b64.5fdb8ed4.k2012; i=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=RNK7rFJ2xxFoZu8CqzUL1e6NXgaMylDMwr7aqLsE/l0=; b=Oy8GHwh6H8cyKcGjMYOhYcM73N85t4hExKDX49BEemtCbSx/TkT/PU3ZSKTC70EiyMIJXILid/lK9jRENO4SMwHsZaCVzpFkISXX/EwErJFPgz+RNDj0pREvgyjY7HrIfnQb8K22nowFMis96qJFGlNkn6L45Zpl/8MQ/ikXKSXmc18AZXCRwtyFLQ6hj5RFSpXoxKjrwp8Zlrz01NZOX0xoW2UlUk2XnFuSFDhl6g9bNi+m49OjMmqcuHpejYIeAXiztZ+THrIzaRVhRXxfeaX6S00A/p0jzAzwO0X/lkythlnZjRJM7itECVIY8GYibs6xpGkveWaDnSpFOCOEMw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=7b64.5fdb8ed4.k2012; olt=johnl-iecc.com@submit.iecc.com; bh=RNK7rFJ2xxFoZu8CqzUL1e6NXgaMylDMwr7aqLsE/l0=; b=nyNXHQGeC3HF1OEOypxjsJM5fwE5qol7R8Ak3ofOQDjyRJRGe4PN7ItdlawUspvoH8sYIoZotuOlnbjjb3fP3GORysfPqZZgiRDVQ18hYC9LUmXxExcT3+z5hIKBLCPbR88Csl5kdySz20gVgmf0QIWvW+MFX53fNYosS8fOpsSZo8uUZXsZEejVMhiSk1lgAdGK3rrtj2xmVJSajE5qwOu0SJkblLuLl7aUlY1OBlwzKTCPcPLhQIDmFV3Ep+YOG4u8SS+b0wDqSThDBu2082cS80GEeKoJwetPUjYw1v5j+9q+R3gN1fzsKliBdp2qSSL+t5tNOqyuqXrt4aiepw==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPSA (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD, johnl@iecc.com) via TCP6; 17 Dec 2020 17:01:07 -0000
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:01:07 -0500
Message-ID: <eb70885d-dda-bd2-5c9-cb6143192e98@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <CEF858E8-023A-4AEA-AAC6-1EC1246D147E@eggert.org>
References: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy> <AF7F0885-2D39-4F8D-A43B-E1D015146EAE@eggert.org> <2fb0b749-8d33-c5b2-39dd-8f351cdfac0@taugh.com> <CEF858E8-023A-4AEA-AAC6-1EC1246D147E@eggert.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Lars Eggert wrote: > How likely is it that someone would try to actually use any of these, and if they did, someone wouldn't notice at some point and call it out? Deliberately, pretty low, by accident due to overhelpful editing tools, not all that low. > In other words, is it really worth doing this? Or are those guardrails so simple that it's straightforward to do this? Unicode has script rules we can point to. We don't have to invent anything. Regards, John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ rfc-interest mailing list rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
- [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Henrik Levkowetz
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Michael Richardson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 tom petch
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Jay Daley
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin Thomson
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 tom petch
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Julian Reschke
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Eric Rescorla
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 John R Levine
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Salz, Rich
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Lars Eggert
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3 Carsten Bormann