Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 11 January 2021 19:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49C3A118F; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.652
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.652 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O7mAY7zs1qqW; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1B33A118E; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5528F40755; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5829EF40755 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fsOtt4cvPouC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A744FF40752 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dc939.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DF48P74pfzyVM; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:51:17 +0100 (CET)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <a010c27d-2f8d-8983-cb00-51e6923b7a2b@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:51:17 +0100
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 632087477.521718-9872b75cc67d65e81ff17d02ee242901
Message-Id: <3764A529-4ACC-4346-813B-C411E4C5929C@tzi.org>
References: <20201216184835.CE1CA2ABC7A1@ary.qy> <AF7F0885-2D39-4F8D-A43B-E1D015146EAE@eggert.org> <2fb0b749-8d33-c5b2-39dd-8f351cdfac0@taugh.com> <CEF858E8-023A-4AEA-AAC6-1EC1246D147E@eggert.org> <eb70885d-dda-bd2-5c9-cb6143192e98@taugh.com> <bc4cb5b1-ac77-9d84-b0a3-38fc2dcb512b@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <F4B91C67-7E4A-407D-A09A-EFC11D2F6678@eggert.org> <a010c27d-2f8d-8983-cb00-51e6923b7a2b@alum.mit.edu>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] Unicode in xml2rfc v3
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2021-01-11, at 19:44, Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> And/or could be part of idnits.

It probably would help with the use of idnits if there was a way for an author to declare intentions, as in “this draft uses math”, “this draft uses typewriter quotes in sourcecode snippets only”.  Lots of heuristics, which will grow with time, but could be really useful.

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest