IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Tue, 22 June 2021 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9596E3A1A97 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=wLTW0qJn; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=UnpsAHDa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EiXkoQwICXoZ for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 581203A1A92 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 14:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309875C00E1 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:31:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:31:18 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=RqHiINBxs3GTOc7TH5Ey8Rls7TE0b/+ 56q7lslmClsw=; b=wLTW0qJnaI3DUCiN6hJxmN/5rYWY4rUmuMVxq/+6yPJ2Xy5 SMm33mPJ5mobAwysaxZaPgm1moxJod4M4S4wWIoEtJk3QOdVmehpPCwjyDj8kGh7 EiGfCJO6afPFayMBwogUi31xurCHUPdx/BV5mrH/nOGkg/+SkDJbw5FUHpAVmqjL P24ywoTEGKfiDRI8SKsG+ehoDwUmM0KkLMRJIPsi/sUFLRHwjwweGkPF6owrsjZy YQFD1cDPut1FI1b47jURk2cFb8edoTKLpgZQO9w6gEQYri9bdyJdyQA6An2KXEV9 vCf6l+zcNrbUBB7UvHaOMuq/10Qu4Dh1wp1MliA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=RqHiIN Bxs3GTOc7TH5Ey8Rls7TE0b/+56q7lslmClsw=; b=UnpsAHDaJHSIMhq1QedjVn gALIQXvTWmQmP4lXXS9mU/Atseor12lMcXBHqKRWn5zVGYMdwgLduB2kNIsOGUba tM6e4ImgLHgjphm/cjtz7Zal3x/h4h7d7qHuT4NA7IPKijXy2IeCbHqHbpm8xB6s wTx1pFO08k0iPB3sQ3cEBX8Q2qRnAQLw2yYGgz6C/KMFJemkQJAwdq9axJA5fDh0 yHbrJmQSFf3OFPNYGdSPqmEGcP1JQJfjAxYsDoKdfrq6Vl23kZxLX/ORXO/M2QX+ I1t+zMN6dIsW8sRMAzNIrz+4Jnm188vth+wmeVqRv8FmaBmnXiLYwSkX5Xr7KqkA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pVbSYDK3NIuS5zO0ZrJHYwvP6gIcla3l2ggOeDVHxypvLL6PHAtTHw> <xme:pVbSYHIIFyhMZtPrNa-cepObr_R4CqZBm1XH_4ZJ3OC_h2XYw5WzQam7BefAaXXAn fHiNw0xcX8pTFrEw6s>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeeguddgudeiudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesth dtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehl ohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheefteduudduhedtke fhvdfhteelffdujeegjeffheffveekudeigfeuveekfeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihii vgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pVbSYLtc3V_Zn6hmexOUBm016IZ6F5A5WZsip1OyGHB33UjSkBYMxA> <xmx:pVbSYMbp150dcRI54C0hHgfApAixVz1bBiXrEB-3hWr2HmlZM7l2dQ> <xmx:pVbSYKYxwqPx85yUsGs2hesR-njjr2mkI7M9XWQ-9HMSdyO4ttFnxw> <xmx:plbSYDkWHsTZu17cvJGR6-bBG-n6nTWvqxNR1fCiSqw5akhTZkE1kQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 813C54E00AA; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 17:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-530-gd0c265785f-fm-20210616.002-gd0c26578
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7bda1df1-307b-4370-ad94-71af09af12c4@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0ace01d767a5$39001350$ab0039f0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <7ef10df2-cb21-a95b-b977-286b6d8a8405@lear.ch> <0a8101d76788$0e1af5a0$2a50e0e0$@olddog.co.uk> <fdb50b3a-a0e1-1421-4a4f-733002cfccda@lear.ch> <0ace01d767a5$39001350$ab0039f0$@olddog.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:30:56 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: rfced-future@iab.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/4vcpGU6fMiHj51WJlHneMKoypv8>
Subject: Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:31:25 -0000

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, at 06:28, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> I think a stream exists because an organisation has requested to 
> publish within the RFC Series. 
> The owner of the Series surely decides whether to allow publication and 
> whether a new stream is appropriate.
> 
> I'm also interested in how a stream is shut down. Who makes that decision?

My simple answer to both of these is: the RSWG proposes a change to the structure (add a stream, remove a stream) and the RSAB approves it.  I think that both warrant publishing an RFC that documents the addition.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email