Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor

["Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]>]

If the IAB retains the right to rewrite or refuse the documents from 
this process, then I do not see what we have accomplished with this 
entire circus ???

Yours,
Joel

On 6/25/2021 1:16 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
> 
> On 6/24/2021 1:46 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2021-6-24, at 7:57, Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]> 
>> wrote:
>>> As somebody else said, this stream by its very nature is going to be 
>>> special and even self-referential. The notion we have of a stream 
>>> being a client of the RFC Series just doesn't apply, so the normal 
>>> notion of a stream manager doesn't apply**. But surely we need 
>>> someone to act as progress chaser and nit resolver when a document 
>>> has left the RSAB and is inside the RPC? And who will that be if it's 
>>> not the RSEA?
>> I still remain unconvinced that we even need a new stream. I may be in 
>> the rough, but I would be OK with using the IAB stream and leaving the 
>> IAB a role here.
> 
> +1. That seems a much simpler solution than creating yet another rarely 
> used structure.
> 
> -- Christian Huitema
>