Re: [Rfced-future] Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

Yes, you're correct; so the IESG and IRSG should each pick
a regular participant, but presumably a deputy could attend
if necessary. 

Regards
   Brian

On 26-Jun-21 09:29, Joel Halpern Direct wrote:
> If those are the stream managers, then we need a different description 
> for the makeup of the RSAB.  It would be rather odd if the IESG sent 
> different people at different times to the RSAB activities.  Presumably 

> we hope for some limited degree of continuity.
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 6/25/2021 5:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> On 26-Jun-21 08:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On 6/25/21 2:52 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>>>> Hmm.  That does not seem to match reality.
>>>
>>> Well, then we should align documentation with reality. ;-)
>>
>> How about
>>
>>    the IESG (represented by any AD) and the IRSG (normally represented 
by the IRTF Chair)
>>
>>       Brian
>>
>>>
>>>> The IESG and IRSG do not
>>>> attend the stream managers meetings.  From everything I have ever
>> been
>>>> told about, the IRTF chair and the IETF chair have historically attended
>>>> those meetings.  And made practical decisions.  (I am sure 
that for
>>>> major items the IETF Chair checks with the IESG.  The IRSG serves
>> at the
>>>> pleasure of the IRTF chair, so whether he (the IRTF Chair) checks with
>>>> them is presumably up to him.)
>>>
>>> Right.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>