[Rfced-future] RSAB membership (was Re: Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor)

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Mon, 28 June 2021 07:00 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28133A078F for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.888
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hoorrpKmhQJ4 for <rfced-future@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A833A2E40 for <rfced-future@iab.org>; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 00:00:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.61.144.39] ([173.38.220.43]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 15S70GCX034023 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:00:21 +0200
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1624863630; bh=XQQolfpJBZn5PyXbW4tNvpIM911Ge4sM9etE+z/Jf0s=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=o4ZjiIpRlVfsu+aPYhUKZUn1ISTfJArhGgfKkhN+N29U1R4y+9QlHytN6kEBCOL4U KhJbwOq3xqjDsSht/UdvGhbw/XGqEu6u0hr0eHnFyuha539DqPqxpJDhpR14w2WZhI a4BGpzINnOL/pTSEQM7FU38DGibjAA7U2LJgGCJQ=
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@mozilla.com>
Cc: rfced-future@iab.org
References: <3f4c264e-4639-4d6b-cf22-0a2be503decc@joelhalpern.com> <3D3EC062-7B1A-43C4-99D5-A204A4565ECE@ietf.org> <cf2921d8-fd1f-d9c9-da72-ff760eda347c@lear.ch> <3b4b6d91-64e3-d0d7-bcbc-284f29a46fb7@joelhalpern.com> <2d926822-5c68-2279-b197-836534f3c030@mozilla.com> <faf54e3b-5c3c-4a97-f364-47c14c251eed@joelhalpern.com> <55602726-93b9-d03c-447c-9d4b9ede5397@mozilla.com> <34f4e8eb-3c81-6cb0-5cf1-ee3ab3b6cc5f@gmail.com> <d9d7116f-1603-4c5c-116a-176659aa418f@joelhalpern.com> <708a0477-2df9-d36c-61ba-27c2e0d2f2b7@gmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Message-ID: <84234113-6edd-e9fd-8196-c23a5517197e@lear.ch>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:00:03 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <708a0477-2df9-d36c-61ba-27c2e0d2f2b7@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qgf4l6mDcQujAHGsL7L4n0xITjJD55oH2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rfced-future/dP4whAfQAgsOBZslwCZ7thxBM7U>
Subject: [Rfced-future] RSAB membership (was Re: Consensus check: Issue 22 – new stream for RFC Editor)
X-BeenThere: rfced-future@iab.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: RFC Editor Future Development Program <rfced-future.iab.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/options/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rfced-future/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfced-future@iab.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/rfced-future>, <mailto:rfced-future-request@iab.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:00:43 -0000

Hi,

On 25.06.21 23:42, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Yes, you're correct; so the IESG and IRSG should each pick
> a regular participant, but presumably a deputy could attend
> if necessary.


Here is what the text says:

    The voting members of the RSAB shall be as follows:

    o  One delegate representing the IETF stream, appointed by the IESG

    o  One delegate representing the IAB stream, appointed by the IAB

    o  The IRTF Chair, representing the IRTF stream

    o  The Independent Submissions Editor [RFC8730]

    o  The RFC Series Editor/Advisor

This means that the text in the draft is aligned with reality. My 
suggestion is that we be explicit about term duration for the IESG and 
IAB members, and whether they can be replaced mid term. The issue with 
replacing someone mid term is that it takes a while for someone to learn 
the job.

So maybe something like this:

NEW:

    "The IAB and IESG delegates shall serve for one year renewable
    terms.  Should a delegate become unavailable, the appointing body
    MAY replace that individual to complete the term."

This allows transitions to align with any membership changes within 
those bodies.

Eliot